Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e64 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e64 33686810!7940118!33686810     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Korean+Med+Sci 2021 ; 36 (9): e64 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33686810|t=2021. Comparison of Serologic Response of Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients Using 8 Immunoassays |pdf=|usr=}}{{33686810}} gab.com Text Comparison of Serologic Response of Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients Using 8 Immunoassays JO: J Korean Med Sci http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33686810 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: In Korea, there were issues regarding the use of immunoassays for anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies to detect infection. So, we compared antibody results of eight kinds of commercial immunoassays using clinical remnant specimens. METHODS: We compared the results of several immunoassay kits tested on 40 serum samples from 15 confirmed patients and 86 remnant serum samples from clinical laboratory. Eight kinds of IVD kits-four enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, two lateral flow rapid immunochromatographic assays, and two chemiluminescent immunoassays with one RUO kit were tested. RESULTS: Among 40 serum samples from 15 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, 35 yielded at least one positive result for detecting antibodies in the combined assessment. There were inconsistent results in 12 (28%) samples by single immunoassay. Forty samples collected in 2019 before the first COVID-19 Korean case showed negative results except for one equivocal result. CONCLUSION: The discrepant results obtained with different immunoassay kits in this study show that serological assessment of SARS-CoV-2 by a single immunoassay requires caution not only in detecting infection but also in assessing immunologic status. Twit Text FOAVip Comparison of Serologic Response of Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients Using 8 Immunoassays ????J Korean Med Sci http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33686810 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33686810 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33686810}}</ref> Comparison of Serologic Response of Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients Using 8 Immunoassays #MMPMID33686810 Lee SM; Kim IS; Lim S; Lee SJ; Kim WJ; Shin KH; Moon SY; Chang CL J Korean Med Sci 2021[Mar]; 36 (9): e64 PMID33686810show ga BACKGROUND: In Korea, there were issues regarding the use of immunoassays for anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies to detect infection. So, we compared antibody results of eight kinds of commercial immunoassays using clinical remnant specimens. METHODS: We compared the results of several immunoassay kits tested on 40 serum samples from 15 confirmed patients and 86 remnant serum samples from clinical laboratory. Eight kinds of IVD kits-four enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, two lateral flow rapid immunochromatographic assays, and two chemiluminescent immunoassays with one RUO kit were tested. RESULTS: Among 40 serum samples from 15 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, 35 yielded at least one positive result for detecting antibodies in the combined assessment. There were inconsistent results in 12 (28%) samples by single immunoassay. Forty samples collected in 2019 before the first COVID-19 Korean case showed negative results except for one equivocal result. CONCLUSION: The discrepant results obtained with different immunoassay kits in this study show that serological assessment of SARS-CoV-2 by a single immunoassay requires caution not only in detecting infection but also in assessing immunologic status. |Antibodies, Viral/*blood[MESH] |COVID-19/*diagnosis/virology[MESH] |Hospitalization[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Immunoassay/*methods[MESH] |Immunoglobulin G/blood[MESH] |Reagent Kits, Diagnostic[MESH]Comparison of Serologic Response of Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients Usi(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing