Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.jiac.2021.02.025 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.jiac.2021.02.025 33676843!7906513!33676843     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Infect+Chemother 2021 ; 27 (6): 915-918 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33676843|t=2021. Immunochromatography and chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay for COVID-19 diagnosis |pdf=|usr=}}{{33676843}} gab.com Text Immunochromatography and chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay for COVID-19 diagnosis JO: J Infect Chemother http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33676843 #FOAvip INTRODUCTION: The rapid and accurate detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is required to prevent the spread of COVID-19. This study evaluated the utility of two SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection methods. METHODS: We evaluated two types of antigen detection methods using immunochromatography (Espline) and quantitative chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (Lumipulse). RT-PCR was performed as a standard procedure for COVID-19 diagnosis. Lumipulse and RT-PCR were performed for all 486 nasopharyngeal swabs and 136 saliva samples, and the Espline test was performed for 271 nasopharyngeal swabs and 93 saliva samples. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the Espline test were 10/11 and 260/260 (100%), respectively for the nasopharyngeal swabs and 3/9 and 84/84 (100%), respectively for the saliva samples. High sensitivities for both saliva (8/9) and nasopharyngeal swabs (22/24) were observed in the Lumipulse test. The specificities of the Lumipulse test for nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva samples were 460/462 (99.6%) and 123/127 (96.9%), respectively. CONCLUSION: The Espline test is not effective for saliva samples but is useful for simple and rapid COVID-19 tests using nasopharyngeal swabs because it does not require special devices. The Lumipulse test is a powerful high-throughput tool for COVID-19 diagnosis because it has high detection performance for nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva samples. Twit Text FOAVip Immunochromatography and chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay for COVID-19 diagnosis ????J Infect Chemother http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33676843 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33676843 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33676843}}</ref> Immunochromatography and chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay for COVID-19 diagnosis #MMPMID33676843 Ishii T; Sasaki M; Yamada K; Kato D; Osuka H; Aoki K; Morita T; Ishii Y; Tateda K J Infect Chemother 2021[Jun]; 27 (6): 915-918 PMID33676843show ga INTRODUCTION: The rapid and accurate detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is required to prevent the spread of COVID-19. This study evaluated the utility of two SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection methods. METHODS: We evaluated two types of antigen detection methods using immunochromatography (Espline) and quantitative chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (Lumipulse). RT-PCR was performed as a standard procedure for COVID-19 diagnosis. Lumipulse and RT-PCR were performed for all 486 nasopharyngeal swabs and 136 saliva samples, and the Espline test was performed for 271 nasopharyngeal swabs and 93 saliva samples. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the Espline test were 10/11 and 260/260 (100%), respectively for the nasopharyngeal swabs and 3/9 and 84/84 (100%), respectively for the saliva samples. High sensitivities for both saliva (8/9) and nasopharyngeal swabs (22/24) were observed in the Lumipulse test. The specificities of the Lumipulse test for nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva samples were 460/462 (99.6%) and 123/127 (96.9%), respectively. CONCLUSION: The Espline test is not effective for saliva samples but is useful for simple and rapid COVID-19 tests using nasopharyngeal swabs because it does not require special devices. The Lumipulse test is a powerful high-throughput tool for COVID-19 diagnosis because it has high detection performance for nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva samples. |*Chromatography, Affinity[MESH] |*Immunoenzyme Techniques[MESH] |*Luminescent Measurements[MESH] |Adolescent[MESH] |Adult[MESH] |Aged[MESH] |Aged, 80 and over[MESH] |Antigens, Viral/isolation & purification[MESH] |COVID-19 Testing/*methods[MESH] |COVID-19/*diagnosis[MESH] |Child[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Middle Aged[MESH] |Nasopharynx/virology[MESH] |Saliva/virology[MESH]Immunochromatography and chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay for COVID(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing