Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.oooo.2021.01.028 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.oooo.2021.01.028 33637473!7849433!33637473     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Oral+Surg+Oral+Med+Oral+Pathol+Oral+Radiol 2021 ; 131 (5): 540-548 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33637473|t=2021. Saliva sample for the massive screening of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review |pdf=|usr=}}{{33637473}} gab.com Text Saliva sample for the massive screening of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review JO: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33637473 #FOAvip OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to describe the value of saliva as a noninvasive sample for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in comparison with the current method for sample collection, the nasopharyngeal swab. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review of the literature following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. We searched in 5 databases (PubMed, Cochrane, EBSCO, Elsevier, and MEDLINE) and included articles published between December 2019 and July 2020. RESULTS: This review included 22 publications that met inclusion criteria, 17 of which were case series, 2 of which were case reports, and 3 of which were massive screenings. All articles compared saliva with nasopharyngeal swabs. The detection rate of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva was similar to that for nasopharyngeal swabs. The sensitivity ranged between 20% and 97%, and specificity ranged between 66% and 100%. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review found that saliva might be an appropriate, fast, painless, simple, and noninvasive sample for SARS-CoV-2 detection, making it ideal for massive screening of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Twit Text FOAVip Saliva sample for the massive screening of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review ????Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33637473 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33637473 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33637473}}</ref> Saliva sample for the massive screening of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review #MMPMID33637473 Canete MG; Valenzuela IM; Garces PC; Masso IC; Gonzalez MJ; Providell SG Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2021[May]; 131 (5): 540-548 PMID33637473show ga OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to describe the value of saliva as a noninvasive sample for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in comparison with the current method for sample collection, the nasopharyngeal swab. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review of the literature following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. We searched in 5 databases (PubMed, Cochrane, EBSCO, Elsevier, and MEDLINE) and included articles published between December 2019 and July 2020. RESULTS: This review included 22 publications that met inclusion criteria, 17 of which were case series, 2 of which were case reports, and 3 of which were massive screenings. All articles compared saliva with nasopharyngeal swabs. The detection rate of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva was similar to that for nasopharyngeal swabs. The sensitivity ranged between 20% and 97%, and specificity ranged between 66% and 100%. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review found that saliva might be an appropriate, fast, painless, simple, and noninvasive sample for SARS-CoV-2 detection, making it ideal for massive screening of SARS-CoV-2 infection. |*COVID-19[MESH] |*SARS-CoV-2[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Mass Screening[MESH]Saliva sample for the massive screening of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a sys(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing