Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.amj.2020.12.002 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.amj.2020.12.002 33637273!7836406!33637273     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33637273&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215       Air+Med+J 2021 ; 40 (2): 112-114 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33637273|t=2021. A Critical Care Transport Program s Innovative Approach to Safety During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic |pdf=|usr=}}{{33637273}} gab.com Text A Critical Care Transport Program s Innovative Approach to Safety During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic JO: Air Med J http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33637273 #FOAvip OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in the frequent transfer of critically ill patients, yet there is little information available to assist critical care transport programs in protecting their clinicians from disease exposure in this unique environment. The Lifeline Critical Care Transport Program has implemented several novel interventions to reduce the risk of staff exposure. METHODS: Several safety interventions were implemented at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. These initiatives included the deployment of a transport safety officer, a receiving clean team for select interfacility transports, and modifications in personal protective equipment. RESULTS: From February 29, 2020, to August 29, 2020, there were 1,041 transports of persons under investigation, 660 (63.4%) of whom were ultimately found to be COVID-19 positive. Approximately one third were ground transports, 11 (1.1%) were by air, and the remainder were intrahospital transports. There were 0 documented staff exposures or illnesses during the study period. CONCLUSION: The adaptation of these safety measures resulted in 0 staff exposures or illnesses while maintaining a high-volume, high-acuity critical care transport program. These interventions are the first of their kind to be implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic and offer a framework for other organizations and future disease outbreaks. Twit Text FOAVip A Critical Care Transport Program s Innovative Approach to Safety During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic ????Air Med J http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33637273 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33637273 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33637273}}</ref> A Critical Care Transport Program s Innovative Approach to Safety During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic #MMPMID33637273 Garfinkel E; Lopez S; Troncoso R Jr; Leon D; Hubble H; Bowman C; Margolis A Air Med J 2021[Mar]; 40 (2): 112-114 PMID33637273show ga OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in the frequent transfer of critically ill patients, yet there is little information available to assist critical care transport programs in protecting their clinicians from disease exposure in this unique environment. The Lifeline Critical Care Transport Program has implemented several novel interventions to reduce the risk of staff exposure. METHODS: Several safety interventions were implemented at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. These initiatives included the deployment of a transport safety officer, a receiving clean team for select interfacility transports, and modifications in personal protective equipment. RESULTS: From February 29, 2020, to August 29, 2020, there were 1,041 transports of persons under investigation, 660 (63.4%) of whom were ultimately found to be COVID-19 positive. Approximately one third were ground transports, 11 (1.1%) were by air, and the remainder were intrahospital transports. There were 0 documented staff exposures or illnesses during the study period. CONCLUSION: The adaptation of these safety measures resulted in 0 staff exposures or illnesses while maintaining a high-volume, high-acuity critical care transport program. These interventions are the first of their kind to be implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic and offer a framework for other organizations and future disease outbreaks. |*Emergency Medical Services[MESH] |*Pandemics[MESH] |*Transportation of Patients/organization & administration[MESH] |Baltimore/epidemiology[MESH] |COVID-19/epidemiology/*prevention & control[MESH] |Communicable Disease Control/*methods[MESH] |Critical Care[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Program Evaluation[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]A Critical Care Transport Program s Innovative Approach to Safety Duri(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing