Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1038/s41598-021-83967-7

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1038/s41598-021-83967-7
suck pdf from google scholar
33633145!7907061!33633145
unlimited free pdf from europmc33633145    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi


Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534

Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
pmid33633145      Sci+Rep 2021 ; 11 (1): 4673
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Machine learning based predictors for COVID-19 disease severity #MMPMID33633145
  • Patel D; Kher V; Desai B; Lei X; Cen S; Nanda N; Gholamrezanezhad A; Duddalwar V; Varghese B; Oberai AA
  • Sci Rep 2021[Feb]; 11 (1): 4673 PMID33633145show ga
  • Predictors of the need for intensive care and mechanical ventilation can help healthcare systems in planning for surge capacity for COVID-19. We used socio-demographic data, clinical data, and blood panel profile data at the time of initial presentation to develop machine learning algorithms for predicting the need for intensive care and mechanical ventilation. Among the algorithms considered, the Random Forest classifier performed the best with [Formula: see text] for predicting ICU need and [Formula: see text] for predicting the need for mechanical ventilation. We also determined the most influential features in making this prediction, and concluded that all three categories of data are important. We determined the relative importance of blood panel profile data and noted that the AUC dropped by 0.12 units when this data was not included, thus indicating that it provided valuable information in predicting disease severity. Finally, we generated RF predictors with a reduced set of five features that retained the performance of the predictors trained on all features. These predictors, which rely only on quantitative data, are less prone to errors and subjectivity.
  • |*Machine Learning[MESH]
  • |Adolescent[MESH]
  • |Adult[MESH]
  • |Aged[MESH]
  • |Aged, 80 and over[MESH]
  • |COVID-19/blood/*diagnosis/epidemiology[MESH]
  • |Cohort Studies[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Intensive Care Units[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Middle Aged[MESH]
  • |Prognosis[MESH]
  • |Risk Factors[MESH]
  • |SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification[MESH]
  • |Severity of Illness Index[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box