Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1073/pnas.2021726118 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1073/pnas.2021726118 33619178!7958192!33619178     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Proc+Natl+Acad+Sci+U+S+A 2021 ; 118 (10): ä Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33619178|t=2021. Influence of a COVID-19 vaccine s effectiveness and safety profile on vaccination acceptance |pdf=|usr=}}{{33619178}} gab.com Text Influence of a COVID-19 vaccine s effectiveness and safety profile on vaccination acceptance JO: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33619178 #FOAvip Although a safe and effective vaccine holds the greatest promise for resolving the COVID-19 pandemic, hesitancy to accept vaccines remains common. To explore vaccine acceptance decisions, we conducted a national survey of 1,000 people from all US states in August of 2020 and a replication in December of 2020. Using a 3 x 3 x 3 factorial experimental design, we estimated the impact of three factors: probability of 1) protection against COVID-19, 2) minor side effects, and 3) a serious adverse reactions. The outcome was respondents' reported likelihood of receiving a vaccine for the coronavirus. Probability of vaccine efficacy (50%, 70%, or 90%) had the largest effect among the three factors. The probability of minor side effects (50%, 75%, 90%) including fever and sore arm, did not significantly influence likelihood of receiving the vaccine. The chances of a serious adverse reaction, such as temporary or permanent paralysis, had a small but significant effect. A serious adverse reaction rate of 1/100,000 was more likely to discourage vaccine use in comparison to rates of 1/million or 1/100 million. All interactions between the factors were nonsignificant. A replication following the announcement that vaccines were 95% effective showed small, but significant increases in the likelihood of taking a vaccine. The main effects and interactions in the model remained unchanged. Expected benefit was more influential in respondents' decision making than expected side effects. The absence of interaction effects suggests that respondents consider the side effects and benefits independently. Twit Text FOAVip Influence of a COVID-19 vaccine s effectiveness and safety profile on vaccination acceptance ????Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33619178 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33619178 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33619178}}</ref> Influence of a COVID-19 vaccine s effectiveness and safety profile on vaccination acceptance #MMPMID33619178 Kaplan RM; Milstein A Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021[Mar]; 118 (10): ä PMID33619178show ga Although a safe and effective vaccine holds the greatest promise for resolving the COVID-19 pandemic, hesitancy to accept vaccines remains common. To explore vaccine acceptance decisions, we conducted a national survey of 1,000 people from all US states in August of 2020 and a replication in December of 2020. Using a 3 x 3 x 3 factorial experimental design, we estimated the impact of three factors: probability of 1) protection against COVID-19, 2) minor side effects, and 3) a serious adverse reactions. The outcome was respondents' reported likelihood of receiving a vaccine for the coronavirus. Probability of vaccine efficacy (50%, 70%, or 90%) had the largest effect among the three factors. The probability of minor side effects (50%, 75%, 90%) including fever and sore arm, did not significantly influence likelihood of receiving the vaccine. The chances of a serious adverse reaction, such as temporary or permanent paralysis, had a small but significant effect. A serious adverse reaction rate of 1/100,000 was more likely to discourage vaccine use in comparison to rates of 1/million or 1/100 million. All interactions between the factors were nonsignificant. A replication following the announcement that vaccines were 95% effective showed small, but significant increases in the likelihood of taking a vaccine. The main effects and interactions in the model remained unchanged. Expected benefit was more influential in respondents' decision making than expected side effects. The absence of interaction effects suggests that respondents consider the side effects and benefits independently. |*Patient Acceptance of Health Care[MESH] |Adolescent[MESH] |Adult[MESH] |Aged[MESH] |COVID-19 Vaccines/*adverse effects/*pharmacology[MESH] |COVID-19/*prevention & control[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Health Surveys[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Middle Aged[MESH] |Politics[MESH] |Random Allocation[MESH] |United States[MESH]Influence of a COVID-19 vaccine s effectiveness and safety profile on (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing