Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.7150/ijbs.53982

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.7150/ijbs.53982
suck pdf from google scholar
33613111!7893593!33613111
unlimited free pdf from europmc33613111    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid33613111      Int+J+Biol+Sci 2021 ; 17 (2): 539-548
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • A rapid screening classifier for diagnosing COVID-19 #MMPMID33613111
  • Xia Y; Chen W; Ren H; Zhao J; Wang L; Jin R; Zhou J; Wang Q; Yan F; Zhang B; Lou J; Wang S; Li X; Zhou J; Xia L; Jin C; Feng J; Li W; Shen H
  • Int J Biol Sci 2021[]; 17 (2): 539-548 PMID33613111show ga
  • Rationale: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused a global pandemic. A classifier combining chest X-ray (CXR) with clinical features may serve as a rapid screening approach. Methods: The study included 512 patients with COVID-19 and 106 with influenza A/B pneumonia. A deep neural network (DNN) was applied, and deep features derived from CXR and clinical findings formed fused features for diagnosis prediction. Results: The clinical features of COVID-19 and influenza showed different patterns. Patients with COVID-19 experienced less fever, more diarrhea, and more salient hypercoagulability. Classifiers constructed using the clinical features or CXR had an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.909 and 0.919, respectively. The diagnostic efficacy of the classifier combining the clinical features and CXR was dramatically improved and the AUC was 0.952 with 91.5% sensitivity and 81.2% specificity. Moreover, combined classifier was functional in both severe and non-serve COVID-19, with an AUC of 0.971 with 96.9% sensitivity in non-severe cases, which was on par with the computed tomography (CT)-based classifier, but had relatively inferior efficacy in severe cases compared to CT. In extension, we performed a reader study involving three experienced pulmonary physicians, artificial intelligence (AI) system demonstrated superiority in turn-around time and diagnostic accuracy compared with experienced pulmonary physicians. Conclusions: The classifier constructed using clinical and CXR features is efficient, economical, and radiation safe for distinguishing COVID-19 from influenza A/B pneumonia, serving as an ideal rapid screening tool during the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • |*Radiography, Thoracic[MESH]
  • |Aged[MESH]
  • |COVID-19 Testing/*methods[MESH]
  • |COVID-19/*diagnostic imaging/epidemiology/physiopathology/virology[MESH]
  • |Deep Learning[MESH]
  • |Diagnosis, Differential[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Influenza A virus/isolation & purification[MESH]
  • |Influenza B virus/isolation & purification[MESH]
  • |Influenza, Human/*diagnostic imaging/physiopathology/virology[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Middle Aged[MESH]
  • |Pandemics[MESH]
  • |Pneumonia[MESH]
  • |Pneumonia, Viral/*diagnostic imaging/physiopathology/virology[MESH]
  • |ROC Curve[MESH]
  • |Retrospective Studies[MESH]
  • |SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box