Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1007/s10677-021-10160-0 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s10677-021-10160-0 33613085!7882228!33613085     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Ethical+Theory+Moral+Pract 2021 ; 24 (1): 285-300 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33613085|t=2021. Crisis Nationalism: To What Degree Is National Partiality Justifiable during a Global Pandemic?|pdf=|usr=}}{{33613085}} gab.com Text Crisis Nationalism: To What Degree Is National Partiality Justifiable during a Global Pandemic JO: Ethical Theory Moral Pract http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33613085 #FOAvip Are countries especially entitled, if not obliged, to prioritize the interests or well-being of their own citizens during a global crisis, such as a global pandemic? We call this partiality for compatriots in times of crisis "crisis nationalism". Vaccine nationalism is one vivid example of crisis nationalism during the COVID-19 pandemic; so is the case of the US government's purchasing a 3-month supply of the global stock of the antiviral Remdesivir for domestic use. Is crisis nationalism justifiable at all, and, if it is, what are its limits? We examine some plausible arguments for national partiality, and conclude that these arguments support crisis nationalism only within strict limits. The different arguments for partiality, as we will note, arrive at these limits for different reasons. But more generally, so we argue, any defensible crisis nationalism must not entail the violation of human rights or the worsening of people's deprivation. Moreover, we propose that good faith crisis nationalism ought to be sensitive to the potential moral costs of national partiality during a global crisis and must take extra care to control or offset these costs. Thus, crisis nationalism in the form of vaccine nationalism or the hoarding of global supplies of therapeutics during a global pandemic exceeds the bounds of acceptable partiality. Twit Text FOAVip Crisis Nationalism: To What Degree Is National Partiality Justifiable during a Global Pandemic ????Ethical Theory Moral Pract http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33613085 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33613085 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33613085}}</ref> Crisis Nationalism: To What Degree Is National Partiality Justifiable during a Global Pandemic? #MMPMID33613085 Beaton E; Gadomski M; Manson D; Tan KC Ethical Theory Moral Pract 2021[]; 24 (1): 285-300 PMID33613085show ga Are countries especially entitled, if not obliged, to prioritize the interests or well-being of their own citizens during a global crisis, such as a global pandemic? We call this partiality for compatriots in times of crisis "crisis nationalism". Vaccine nationalism is one vivid example of crisis nationalism during the COVID-19 pandemic; so is the case of the US government's purchasing a 3-month supply of the global stock of the antiviral Remdesivir for domestic use. Is crisis nationalism justifiable at all, and, if it is, what are its limits? We examine some plausible arguments for national partiality, and conclude that these arguments support crisis nationalism only within strict limits. The different arguments for partiality, as we will note, arrive at these limits for different reasons. But more generally, so we argue, any defensible crisis nationalism must not entail the violation of human rights or the worsening of people's deprivation. Moreover, we propose that good faith crisis nationalism ought to be sensitive to the potential moral costs of national partiality during a global crisis and must take extra care to control or offset these costs. Thus, crisis nationalism in the form of vaccine nationalism or the hoarding of global supplies of therapeutics during a global pandemic exceeds the bounds of acceptable partiality. äCrisis Nationalism: To What Degree Is National Partiality Justifiable (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing