Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.7861/clinmed.2020-0664 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.7861/clinmed.2020-0664 33593831!8002780!33593831     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33593831&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 269.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Clin+Med+(Lond) 2021 ; 21 (2): e155-e160 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33593831|t=2021. To scan or not to scan - D-dimers and computed tomography pulmonary angiography in the era of COVID-19 |pdf=|usr=}}{{33593831}} gab.com Text To scan or not to scan - D-dimers and computed tomography pulmonary angiography in the era of COVID-19 JO: Clin Med (Lond) http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33593831 #FOAvip The COVID-19 pandemic has had many ramifications on healthcare delivery and practice. As part of this, utilising biomarkers to risk stratify patients has become increasingly popular. During the COVID-19 pandemic the use of D-dimer has increased due to the evidence of COVID-19 induced thrombo-embolic disease. We evaluated the use of D-dimer on all hospital admissions during the peak of the pandemic and evaluated its sensitivity in diagnosing pulmonary embolic disease (PE). Patients without COVID-19 infection were as likely to have evidence of PE as their COVID-positive counterparts. However, the sensitivity of a D-dimer was higher in COVID-positive patients at a lower D-dimer level (>1,500 mug/L, sensitivity 81%, specificity 70%) than in those without clinical, immunological or radiological evidence of COVID-19 infection (D-dimer >2,000 mug/L, sensitivity 80%, specificity 76%). These data suggest higher D-dimer thresholds should be considered for the exclusion of pulmonary emboli. Twit Text FOAVip To scan or not to scan - D-dimers and computed tomography pulmonary angiography in the era of COVID-19 ????Clin Med (Lond) http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33593831 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33593831 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33593831}}</ref> To scan or not to scan - D-dimers and computed tomography pulmonary angiography in the era of COVID-19 #MMPMID33593831 Tuck AA; White HL; Abdalla BA; Cartwright GJ; Figg KR; Murphy EN; Pyrke BC; Reynolds MA; Taha RM; Haboubi HN Clin Med (Lond) 2021[Mar]; 21 (2): e155-e160 PMID33593831show ga The COVID-19 pandemic has had many ramifications on healthcare delivery and practice. As part of this, utilising biomarkers to risk stratify patients has become increasingly popular. During the COVID-19 pandemic the use of D-dimer has increased due to the evidence of COVID-19 induced thrombo-embolic disease. We evaluated the use of D-dimer on all hospital admissions during the peak of the pandemic and evaluated its sensitivity in diagnosing pulmonary embolic disease (PE). Patients without COVID-19 infection were as likely to have evidence of PE as their COVID-positive counterparts. However, the sensitivity of a D-dimer was higher in COVID-positive patients at a lower D-dimer level (>1,500 mug/L, sensitivity 81%, specificity 70%) than in those without clinical, immunological or radiological evidence of COVID-19 infection (D-dimer >2,000 mug/L, sensitivity 80%, specificity 76%). These data suggest higher D-dimer thresholds should be considered for the exclusion of pulmonary emboli. |*COVID-19/complications/diagnosis[MESH] |*Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis[MESH] |*Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging[MESH] |Angiography[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH] |Retrospective Studies[MESH]To scan or not to scan - D-dimers and computed tomography pulmonary an(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing