Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.jds.2021.01.010 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.jds.2021.01.010 33558826!7846225!33558826     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33558826&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 245.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Dent+Sci 2021 ; 16 (3): 799-805 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33558826|t=2021. Comparing saliva and nasopharyngeal swab specimens in the detection of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis |pdf=|usr=}}{{33558826}} gab.com Text Comparing saliva and nasopharyngeal swab specimens in the detection of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis JO: J Dent Sci http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33558826 #FOAvip BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Due to the easy transmission of COVID-19, the virus is a threat to global health. Early diagnosis of suspected patients will play an essential role in preventing further spread of COVID-19. The aim of this review study was to evaluate saliva specimen in comparison to nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimen in studies selected from various databases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To achieve the objective of this study, a systematic literature search was carried out in four databases, namely PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and LILACS. The keywords ''COVID-19'', ''Nasopharyngeal Swab'', and ''Saliva'' were utilized via Boolean operators. RESULTS: 14 articles were included in this review study following the eligibility criteria. Based on data presented in studies used in the meta-analysis, there was no significant difference between both specimen types for detection of COVID-19. Heterogeneity test showed that I(2) value was 5.790% (<20%). The effect size (risk ratio) of the 14 studies was 0.951 (<1). CONCLUSION: With the results revealing no significant difference between the two types of specimen in the diagnosis of COVID-19, the use of saliva specimen is preferable for widespread use because it is easily collected without the need for qualified health workers. However, more in vivo studies are required in order to compare and evaluate saliva and NPS specimens in detecting COVID-19 using various techniques. Twit Text FOAVip Comparing saliva and nasopharyngeal swab specimens in the detection of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis ????J Dent Sci http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33558826 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33558826 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33558826}}</ref> Comparing saliva and nasopharyngeal swab specimens in the detection of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis #MMPMID33558826 Nasiri K; Dimitrova A J Dent Sci 2021[Jul]; 16 (3): 799-805 PMID33558826show ga BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Due to the easy transmission of COVID-19, the virus is a threat to global health. Early diagnosis of suspected patients will play an essential role in preventing further spread of COVID-19. The aim of this review study was to evaluate saliva specimen in comparison to nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimen in studies selected from various databases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To achieve the objective of this study, a systematic literature search was carried out in four databases, namely PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and LILACS. The keywords ''COVID-19'', ''Nasopharyngeal Swab'', and ''Saliva'' were utilized via Boolean operators. RESULTS: 14 articles were included in this review study following the eligibility criteria. Based on data presented in studies used in the meta-analysis, there was no significant difference between both specimen types for detection of COVID-19. Heterogeneity test showed that I(2) value was 5.790% (<20%). The effect size (risk ratio) of the 14 studies was 0.951 (<1). CONCLUSION: With the results revealing no significant difference between the two types of specimen in the diagnosis of COVID-19, the use of saliva specimen is preferable for widespread use because it is easily collected without the need for qualified health workers. However, more in vivo studies are required in order to compare and evaluate saliva and NPS specimens in detecting COVID-19 using various techniques. äComparing saliva and nasopharyngeal swab specimens in the detection of(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing