Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1515/dx-2020-0154

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1515/dx-2020-0154
suck pdf from google scholar
33554511!ä!33554511

suck abstract from ncbi


Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 219.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534

Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 219.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
pmid33554511      Diagnosis+(Berl) 2021 ; 8 (3): 322-326
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Clinical assessment of the Roche SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test #MMPMID33554511
  • Salvagno GL; Gianfilippi G; Bragantini D; Henry BM; Lippi G
  • Diagnosis (Berl) 2021[Aug]; 8 (3): 322-326 PMID33554511show ga
  • OBJECTIVES: Novel point-of-care antigen assays present a promising opportunity for rapid screening of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections. The purpose of this study was the clinical assessment of the new Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test. METHODS: The clinical performance of Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test was evaluated vs. a reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) laboratory-based assay (Seegene AllplexTM2019-nCoV) in nasopharyngeal swabs collected from a series of consecutive patients referred for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics to the Pederzoli Hospital (Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy) over a 2-week period. RESULTS: The final study population consisted of 321 consecutive patients (mean age, 46 years and IQR, 32-56 years; 181 women, 56.4%), with 149/321 (46.4%) positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA via the Seegene AllplexTM2019-nCoV Assay, and 109/321 (34.0%) positive with Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test, respectively. The overall accuracy of Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test compared to molecular testing was 86.9%, with 72.5% sensitivity and 99.4% specificity. Progressive decline in performance was observed as cycle threshold (Ct) values of different SARS-CoV-2 gene targets increased. The sensitivity was found to range between 97-100% in clinical samples with Ct values <25, between 50-81% in those with Ct values between 25 and <30, but low as 12-18% in samples with Ct values between 30 and <37. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical performance of Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test is excellent in nasopharyngeal swabs with Ct values <25, which makes it a reliable screening test in patients with high viral load. However, mass community screening would require the use of more sensitive techniques.
  • |Adult[MESH]
  • |Antigens, Viral/*analysis/immunology[MESH]
  • |COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/standards[MESH]
  • |COVID-19 Serological Testing/*standards[MESH]
  • |COVID-19/*diagnosis/immunology/*virology[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Italy[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Middle Aged[MESH]
  • |Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/*standards[MESH]
  • |Nasopharynx/immunology/virology[MESH]
  • |Point-of-Care Systems[MESH]
  • |SARS-CoV-2/*immunology/*isolation & purification[MESH]
  • |Sensitivity and Specificity[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box