Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.jsams.2021.01.005 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.jsams.2021.01.005 33551351!?!33551351 Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33551351&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215       J+Sci+Med+Sport 2021 ; 24 (7): 622-626 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33551351|t=2021. Tandem gait test performance in healthy, physically active adults: Clinical implications for concussion evaluation |pdf=|usr=}}{{33551351}} gab.com Text Tandem gait test performance in healthy, physically active adults: Clinical implications for concussion evaluation JO: J Sci Med Sport http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33551351 #FOAvip OBJECTIVES: To identify factors affecting performance on the tandem gait test in healthy, physically active adults. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. METHODS: Participants completed the tandem gait test according to Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 3 (SCAT3) guidelines. Dependent variables included time for best trial (initial 3m, turn, final 3m and total) and whether the trial was "pass" or "fail". Independent variables included sex, concussion history, foot length, height and total number of trials. RESULTS: 55% (35/64) of participants passed the first trial of the tandem gait test; 19% (12/64) had a best time <14s. Sex and concussion history did not affect performance (p>0.05). There were no differences in turn times for those with and without a history of concussion (t=0.26, p=0.80). The number of trials was not significantly correlated with best time (thorn=-0.04, p=0.74). There were low (thorn=-0.31) to negligible (thorn<0.30) correlations between foot length, height and all portions of the test. There was more variability in times for the turn (COV=27%) than during the straight portions (COV=18%). CONCLUSIONS: Current recommendations for the tandem gait test led to a high false-positive rate in healthy, physically active adults. Sex, concussion history, number of trials and foot length had little to no influence on scores on the test. Turning times were more variable than times on the straight portions of the test. Clinicians may use these results as a guideline when interpreting performance on the tandem gait test in healthy physically active adults. Twit Text FOAVip Tandem gait test performance in healthy, physically active adults: Clinical implications for concussion evaluation ????J Sci Med Sport http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33551351 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33551351 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33551351}}</ref> Tandem gait test performance in healthy, physically active adults: Clinical implications for concussion evaluation #MMPMID33551351 Santo AL; Reed JM; Lynall RC J Sci Med Sport 2021[Jul]; 24 (7): 622-626 PMID33551351show ga OBJECTIVES: To identify factors affecting performance on the tandem gait test in healthy, physically active adults. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. METHODS: Participants completed the tandem gait test according to Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 3 (SCAT3) guidelines. Dependent variables included time for best trial (initial 3m, turn, final 3m and total) and whether the trial was "pass" or "fail". Independent variables included sex, concussion history, foot length, height and total number of trials. RESULTS: 55% (35/64) of participants passed the first trial of the tandem gait test; 19% (12/64) had a best time <14s. Sex and concussion history did not affect performance (p>0.05). There were no differences in turn times for those with and without a history of concussion (t=0.26, p=0.80). The number of trials was not significantly correlated with best time (thorn=-0.04, p=0.74). There were low (thorn=-0.31) to negligible (thorn<0.30) correlations between foot length, height and all portions of the test. There was more variability in times for the turn (COV=27%) than during the straight portions (COV=18%). CONCLUSIONS: Current recommendations for the tandem gait test led to a high false-positive rate in healthy, physically active adults. Sex, concussion history, number of trials and foot length had little to no influence on scores on the test. Turning times were more variable than times on the straight portions of the test. Clinicians may use these results as a guideline when interpreting performance on the tandem gait test in healthy physically active adults. |*Gait Analysis/methods[MESH] |Athletic Injuries/*diagnosis[MESH] |Brain Concussion/*diagnosis[MESH] |Cross-Sectional Studies[MESH] |False Positive Reactions[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Foot/anatomy & histology[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Physical Fitness[MESH] |Postural Balance[MESH] |Reference Values[MESH]Tandem gait test performance in healthy, physically active adults: Cli(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing