Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1016/j.avsg.2021.01.072

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.avsg.2021.01.072
suck pdf from google scholar
33549797!7862030!33549797
unlimited free pdf from europmc33549797    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33549797&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid33549797      Ann+Vasc+Surg 2021 ; 74 (?): 73-79
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • COVID-19 Impact on Vascular Surgery Practice: Experience From an Italian University Regional Hub Center for Vascular Pathology #MMPMID33549797
  • Boschetti GA; Di Gregorio S; Mena Vera JM; Pane B; Spinella G; Palombo D; Pratesi G
  • Ann Vasc Surg 2021[Jul]; 74 (?): 73-79 PMID33549797show ga
  • BACKGROUND: The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on vascular surgery practice in a regional hub center for complex vascular disease. METHODS: This is an observational single-center study in which we collected clinical and surgical data during (P1) and after (P2) the COVID-19 outbreak and the lockdown measures implemented in Northern Italy. We compared those data with the two-month period before the pandemic (P0). RESULTS: Compared to P0, ambulatory activities were severely reduced during P1 and limited to hospitalized patients and outpatients with urgent criteria. We performed 61 operations (18 urgent and 43 elective), with a decrease in both aortic (-17.8%), cerebrovascular (-53.3%), and peripheral artery (-42.6%) disease treatments. We also observed a greater drop in open procedures (-53.2%) than in endovascular ones (-22%). All the elective patients were treated for notdeferrable conditions and they were COVID-19 negative at the ward admission screening; despite this one of them developed COVID19 during the hospital stay. Four COVID-19 positive patients were treated in urgent setting for acute limb ischemia. Throughout P2 we gradually rescheduled elective ambulatory (+155.5%) and surgical (+18%) activities, while remaining substantially lower than during P0 (respectively -45.6% and -25.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite COVID-19 pandemic, our experience shows that with careful patient's selection, dedicated prehospitalization protocol and proper use of personal protective equipment it is possible to guarantee continuity of care.
  • |*COVID-19[MESH]
  • |Academic Medical Centers/*trends[MESH]
  • |Aged[MESH]
  • |Aged, 80 and over[MESH]
  • |Clinical Decision-Making[MESH]
  • |Continuity of Patient Care/trends[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Italy[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Middle Aged[MESH]
  • |Patient Selection[MESH]
  • |Practice Patterns, Physicians'/*trends[MESH]
  • |Regional Health Planning/trends[MESH]
  • |Retrospective Studies[MESH]
  • |Surgeons/*trends[MESH]
  • |Time Factors[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box