Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1177/0145561321992509 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1177/0145561321992509 33528271!?!33528271 Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33528271&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215       Ear+Nose+Throat+J 2023 ; 102 (2): NP89-NP94 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33528271|t=2023. Separating the Physician and Patient: A Paradigm Shift for Routine Otolaryngology Examinations in COVID-19-Like Aerosol-Contaminated Environments |pdf=|usr=}}{{33528271}} gab.com Text Separating the Physician and Patient: A Paradigm Shift for Routine Otolaryngology Examinations in COVID-19-Like Aerosol-Contaminated Environments JO: Ear Nose Throat J http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33528271 #FOAvip OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the attitudes of physicians and patients toward physical examination in physically separated environments using a laryngoscopic examination model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six experienced laryngologists performed laryngoscopic examinations in 30 patients in a closed-chamber examination unit. The physicians and patients were asked to compare all domains with their previous standard laryngoscopic examination experience using a 10-point visual analog scale (0, poor performance; 10, good performance), including effectiveness of communication, difficulty of examination, perception of safety against airborne transmission of COVID-19, applicability of the unit for future examinations, perception of protective environment, and overall comfort. RESULTS: All laryngoscopic examinations were performed successfully. Effectiveness of communication, difficulty of examination, perception of protective environment, and overall comfort did not differ between physicians and patients (P > .05 for all comparisons). However, both physicians and patients found the examination to be difficult. While physicians evaluated the system as safe against airborne transmission of COVID-19, patients were not confident that the system was safe (8.70 +/- 1.93 vs 2.87 +/- 2.37, respectively, P = .001). Physicians also gave a higher score to future applicability of the unit for examinations than patients (8.90 +/- 1.42 vs 7.10 +/- 2.62, respectively, P = .001). CONCLUSION: Physically separating the physician and patient is a feasible method of physical examination in aerosol-contaminated environments. Twit Text FOAVip Separating the Physician and Patient: A Paradigm Shift for Routine Otolaryngology Examinations in COVID-19-Like Aerosol-Contaminated Environments ????Ear Nose Throat J http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33528271 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33528271 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33528271}}</ref> Separating the Physician and Patient: A Paradigm Shift for Routine Otolaryngology Examinations in COVID-19-Like Aerosol-Contaminated Environments #MMPMID33528271 Sayin I; Yazici ZM; Abakay MA; Gulustan F; Devecioglu I; Akgul A Ear Nose Throat J 2023[Feb]; 102 (2): NP89-NP94 PMID33528271show ga OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the attitudes of physicians and patients toward physical examination in physically separated environments using a laryngoscopic examination model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six experienced laryngologists performed laryngoscopic examinations in 30 patients in a closed-chamber examination unit. The physicians and patients were asked to compare all domains with their previous standard laryngoscopic examination experience using a 10-point visual analog scale (0, poor performance; 10, good performance), including effectiveness of communication, difficulty of examination, perception of safety against airborne transmission of COVID-19, applicability of the unit for future examinations, perception of protective environment, and overall comfort. RESULTS: All laryngoscopic examinations were performed successfully. Effectiveness of communication, difficulty of examination, perception of protective environment, and overall comfort did not differ between physicians and patients (P > .05 for all comparisons). However, both physicians and patients found the examination to be difficult. While physicians evaluated the system as safe against airborne transmission of COVID-19, patients were not confident that the system was safe (8.70 +/- 1.93 vs 2.87 +/- 2.37, respectively, P = .001). Physicians also gave a higher score to future applicability of the unit for examinations than patients (8.90 +/- 1.42 vs 7.10 +/- 2.62, respectively, P = .001). CONCLUSION: Physically separating the physician and patient is a feasible method of physical examination in aerosol-contaminated environments. |*COVID-19[MESH] |*Otolaryngology[MESH] |*Physicians[MESH] |*Telemedicine/methods[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Respiratory Aerosols and Droplets[MESH]Separating the Physician and Patient: A Paradigm Shift for Routine Oto(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing