Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2020.12.003 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2020.12.003 33521583!7833108!33521583     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 227.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 227.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 227.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Mayo+Clin+Proc+Innov+Qual+Outcomes 2021 ; 5 (1): 118-126 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33521583|t=2021. Managing Patients in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Virtual Multidisciplinary Approach |pdf=|usr=}}{{33521583}} gab.com Text Managing Patients in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Virtual Multidisciplinary Approach JO: Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33521583 #FOAvip OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of a 60-day pilot of an innovative virtual-care model using general internal medicine physicians and nurses to respond rapidly to more than 1200 coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19)-positive nasopharyngeal polymerase chain reaction tests. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The current study was approved by the Mayo Clinic COVID-19 Research Committee and the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board. The data for all SARS-CoV-2-positive patients treated by our team were entered into a prospectively maintained internal research electronic data capture database. We searched this database retrospectively for the first 60 days of our program (March 23, 2020 to May 22, 2020). The data included basic deidentified demographics; symptoms at intake into the program; date of symptom onset; risk factors; location; and outcomes including hospitalization, admission to intensive care unit, and death. RESULTS: Patients were contacted, on average, 6.3 hours after their results became available. There was a total of 138 ED visits. Of these, 40% were admitted to the hospital, with 36% of those admitted requiring intensive care unit level of care. Of the 849 patients in this sample, there were only 2 deaths (0.23%) at 60 days. CONCLUSION: Our innovative multidisciplinary COVID team provided excellent clinical care for patients with COVID, with a very low mortality rate compared with the national average. Although data are not available on a national scale for time to contact patient, our team was able to contact patients within the established recommendation for contact within 48 hours of testing, which is optimal. Twit Text FOAVip Managing Patients in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Virtual Multidisciplinary Approach ????Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33521583 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33521583 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33521583}}</ref> Managing Patients in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Virtual Multidisciplinary Approach #MMPMID33521583 Ganesh R; Salonen BR; Bhuiyan MN; Bierle DM; Moehnke D; Haddad TC; Tande AJ; Wilson J; Hurt RT Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes 2021[Feb]; 5 (1): 118-126 PMID33521583show ga OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of a 60-day pilot of an innovative virtual-care model using general internal medicine physicians and nurses to respond rapidly to more than 1200 coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19)-positive nasopharyngeal polymerase chain reaction tests. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The current study was approved by the Mayo Clinic COVID-19 Research Committee and the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board. The data for all SARS-CoV-2-positive patients treated by our team were entered into a prospectively maintained internal research electronic data capture database. We searched this database retrospectively for the first 60 days of our program (March 23, 2020 to May 22, 2020). The data included basic deidentified demographics; symptoms at intake into the program; date of symptom onset; risk factors; location; and outcomes including hospitalization, admission to intensive care unit, and death. RESULTS: Patients were contacted, on average, 6.3 hours after their results became available. There was a total of 138 ED visits. Of these, 40% were admitted to the hospital, with 36% of those admitted requiring intensive care unit level of care. Of the 849 patients in this sample, there were only 2 deaths (0.23%) at 60 days. CONCLUSION: Our innovative multidisciplinary COVID team provided excellent clinical care for patients with COVID, with a very low mortality rate compared with the national average. Although data are not available on a national scale for time to contact patient, our team was able to contact patients within the established recommendation for contact within 48 hours of testing, which is optimal. äManaging Patients in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Virtual Multidisciplinar(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing