Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1002/aet2.10524 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1002/aet2.10524 33521498!7821057!33521498     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33521498&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215       AEM+Educ+Train 2021 ; 5 (1): 116-119 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33521498|t=2021. Mock Oral Board Examinations via Web-based Video Teleconferencing in the Era of COVID-19 |pdf=|usr=}}{{33521498}} gab.com Text Mock Oral Board Examinations via Web-based Video Teleconferencing in the Era of COVID-19 JO: AEM Educ Train http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33521498 #FOAvip Owing to infection control measures necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic, many educational didactic components within residency programs have needed to adapt to virtual formats. We describe and evaluate the transition of an in-person mock oral board certification examination to an entirely virtual format. Oral board cases consisting of two single cases and one triple case were adapted to a virtual format using a Web-based video teleconferencing platform. Faculty examiners underwent 20-minute training sessions prior to the examination. Both resident examinees and faculty examiners completed postexamination surveys. The system usability scale (SUS) was used to assess the usability of the new format by the faculty examiners. Fifteen resident examinees completed the mock virtual oral board examination with eight faculty examiners. All faculty members completed the postexamination survey. The mean (+/-SD) SUS score was 90.6 (+/-11.5) out of a maximum of 100. Eleven of 15 (73%) resident examinees completed the postexamination survey. All respondents agreed or strongly agreed that examiner instructions were easy to understand and that examiners were adept at using the Web-based platform. Some technical issues were encountered including audio difficulties for some examiners. Respondents were split regarding personal preference for virtual or in-person mock oral board formats. Utilizing video teleconferencing software to provide a virtual, Web-based alternative to in-person mock oral board examination was feasible, and the virtual format was shown to have high usability despite minimal training time for experienced faculty examiners. Twit Text FOAVip Mock Oral Board Examinations via Web-based Video Teleconferencing in the Era of COVID-19 ????AEM Educ Train http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33521498 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33521498 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33521498}}</ref> Mock Oral Board Examinations via Web-based Video Teleconferencing in the Era of COVID-19 #MMPMID33521498 Chhabra N; Winfield A; Dyer S; Hedayati T AEM Educ Train 2021[Jan]; 5 (1): 116-119 PMID33521498show ga Owing to infection control measures necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic, many educational didactic components within residency programs have needed to adapt to virtual formats. We describe and evaluate the transition of an in-person mock oral board certification examination to an entirely virtual format. Oral board cases consisting of two single cases and one triple case were adapted to a virtual format using a Web-based video teleconferencing platform. Faculty examiners underwent 20-minute training sessions prior to the examination. Both resident examinees and faculty examiners completed postexamination surveys. The system usability scale (SUS) was used to assess the usability of the new format by the faculty examiners. Fifteen resident examinees completed the mock virtual oral board examination with eight faculty examiners. All faculty members completed the postexamination survey. The mean (+/-SD) SUS score was 90.6 (+/-11.5) out of a maximum of 100. Eleven of 15 (73%) resident examinees completed the postexamination survey. All respondents agreed or strongly agreed that examiner instructions were easy to understand and that examiners were adept at using the Web-based platform. Some technical issues were encountered including audio difficulties for some examiners. Respondents were split regarding personal preference for virtual or in-person mock oral board formats. Utilizing video teleconferencing software to provide a virtual, Web-based alternative to in-person mock oral board examination was feasible, and the virtual format was shown to have high usability despite minimal training time for experienced faculty examiners. ?Mock Oral Board Examinations via Web-based Video Teleconferencing in t(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing