Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1002/cpt.2183

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1002/cpt.2183
suck pdf from google scholar
33506495!8014457!33506495
unlimited free pdf from europmc33506495    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid33506495      Clin+Pharmacol+Ther 2021 ; 110 (2): 311-320
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Collaborative Platform Trials to Fight COVID-19: Methodological and Regulatory Considerations for a Better Societal Outcome #MMPMID33506495
  • Collignon O; Burman CF; Posch M; Schiel A
  • Clin Pharmacol Ther 2021[Aug]; 110 (2): 311-320 PMID33506495show ga
  • For the development of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) drugs during the ongoing pandemic, speed is of essence whereas quality of evidence is of paramount importance. Although thousands of COVID-19 trials were rapidly started, many are unlikely to provide robust statistical evidence and meet regulatory standards (e.g., because of lack of randomization or insufficient power). This has led to an inefficient use of time and resources. With more coordination, the sheer number of patients in these trials might have generated convincing data for several investigational treatments. Collaborative platform trials, comparing several drugs to a shared control arm, are an attractive solution. Those trials can utilize a variety of adaptive design features in order to accelerate the finding of life-saving treatments. In this paper, we discuss several possible designs, illustrate them via simulations, and also discuss challenges, such as the heterogeneity of the target population, time-varying standard of care, and the potentially high number of false hypothesis rejections in phase II and phase III trials. We provide corresponding regulatory perspectives on approval and reimbursement, and note that the optimal design of a platform trial will differ with our societal objective and by stakeholder. Hasty approvals may delay the development of better alternatives, whereas searching relentlessly for the single most efficacious treatment may indirectly diminish the number of lives saved as time is lost. We point out the need for incentivizing developers to participate in collaborative evidence-generation initiatives when a positive return on investment is not met.
  • |*COVID-19 Drug Treatment[MESH]
  • |*COVID-19/mortality[MESH]
  • |*Clinical Trials as Topic/legislation & jurisprudence/organization & administration[MESH]
  • |*Research Design[MESH]
  • |Adaptive Clinical Trials as Topic[MESH]
  • |Antiviral Agents/*pharmacology/therapeutic use[MESH]
  • |Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic[MESH]
  • |Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic[MESH]
  • |Drug Approval/legislation & jurisprudence[MESH]
  • |Europe[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Patient Selection[MESH]
  • |Public Opinion[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box