Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1007/s00415-021-10403-1 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s00415-021-10403-1 33496862!7836343!33496862     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33496862&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215       J+Neurol 2021 ; 268 (6): 2228-2237 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33496862|t=2021. Feasibility study of assessing the Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (PACC) score via videoconferencing |pdf=|usr=}}{{33496862}} gab.com Text Feasibility study of assessing the Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (PACC) score via videoconferencing JO: J Neurol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33496862 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: The Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (PACC) is a composite score which can detect the first signs of cognitive impairment, which can be of importance for research and clinical practice. It is designed to be administered in person; however, in-person assessments are costly, and are difficult during the current COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of performing the PACC assessment with videoconferencing, and to compare the validity of this remote PACC with the in-person PACC obtained previously. METHODS: Participants from the HEalth and Ageing Data IN the Game of football (HEADING) Study who had already undergone an in-person assessment were re-contacted and re-assessed remotely. The correlation between the two PACC scores was estimated. The difference between the two PACC scores was calculated and used in multiple linear regression to assess which variables were associated with a difference in PACC scores. FINDINGS: Of the 43 participants who were invited to this external study, 28 were re-assessed. The median duration in days between the in-person and the remote assessments was 236.5 days (7.9 months) (IQR 62.5). There was a strong positive correlation between the two assessments for the PACC score, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.82 (95% CI 0.66, 0.98). The multiple linear regression found that the only predictor of the PACC difference was the time between assessments. INTERPRETATION: This study provides evidence on the feasibility of performing cognitive tests online, with the PACC tests being successfully administered through videoconferencing. This is relevant, especially during times when face-to-face assessments cannot be performed. Twit Text FOAVip Feasibility study of assessing the Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (PACC) score via videoconferencing ????J Neurol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33496862 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33496862 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33496862}}</ref> Feasibility study of assessing the Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (PACC) score via videoconferencing #MMPMID33496862 Seghezzo G; Van Hoecke Y; James L; Davoren D; Williamson E; Pearce N; McElvenny D; Gallo V J Neurol 2021[Jun]; 268 (6): 2228-2237 PMID33496862show ga BACKGROUND: The Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (PACC) is a composite score which can detect the first signs of cognitive impairment, which can be of importance for research and clinical practice. It is designed to be administered in person; however, in-person assessments are costly, and are difficult during the current COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of performing the PACC assessment with videoconferencing, and to compare the validity of this remote PACC with the in-person PACC obtained previously. METHODS: Participants from the HEalth and Ageing Data IN the Game of football (HEADING) Study who had already undergone an in-person assessment were re-contacted and re-assessed remotely. The correlation between the two PACC scores was estimated. The difference between the two PACC scores was calculated and used in multiple linear regression to assess which variables were associated with a difference in PACC scores. FINDINGS: Of the 43 participants who were invited to this external study, 28 were re-assessed. The median duration in days between the in-person and the remote assessments was 236.5 days (7.9 months) (IQR 62.5). There was a strong positive correlation between the two assessments for the PACC score, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.82 (95% CI 0.66, 0.98). The multiple linear regression found that the only predictor of the PACC difference was the time between assessments. INTERPRETATION: This study provides evidence on the feasibility of performing cognitive tests online, with the PACC tests being successfully administered through videoconferencing. This is relevant, especially during times when face-to-face assessments cannot be performed. |*Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis[MESH] |*COVID-19[MESH] |Cognition[MESH] |Feasibility Studies[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]Feasibility study of assessing the Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Com(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing