Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1093/jas/skab019

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1093/jas/skab019
suck pdf from google scholar
33493284!7896628!33493284
unlimited free pdf from europmc33493284    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi


Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 215.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534

Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 215.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534

Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 215.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
pmid33493284      J+Anim+Sci 2021 ; 99 (2): ä
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Comparison of models for missing pedigree in single-step genomic prediction #MMPMID33493284
  • Masuda Y; Tsuruta S; Bermann M; Bradford HL; Misztal I
  • J Anim Sci 2021[Feb]; 99 (2): ä PMID33493284show ga
  • Pedigree information is often missing for some animals in a breeding program. Unknown-parent groups (UPGs) are assigned to the missing parents to avoid biased genetic evaluations. Although the use of UPGs is well established for the pedigree model, it is unclear how UPGs are integrated into the inverse of the unified relationship matrix (H-inverse) required for single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction. A generalization of the UPG model is the metafounder (MF) model. The objectives of this study were to derive 3 H-inverses and to compare genetic trends among models with UPG and MF H-inverses using a simulated purebred population. All inverses were derived using the joint density function of the random breeding values and genetic groups. The breeding values of genotyped animals (u2) were assumed to be adjusted for UPG effects (g) using matrix Q2 as u2 *=u2+Q2g before incorporating genomic information. The Quaas-Pollak-transformed (QP) H-inverse was derived using a joint density function of u2 * and g updated with genomic information and assuming nonzero cov(u2 *,g'). The modified QP (altered) H-inverse also assumes that the genomic information updates u2 * and g, but cov(u2 *,g')=0. The UPG-encapsulated (EUPG) H-inverse assumed genomic information updates the distribution of u2 *. The EUPG H-inverse had the same structure as the MF H-inverse. Fifty percent of the genotyped females in the simulation had a missing dam, and missing parents were replaced with UPGs by generation. The simulation study indicated that u2 * and g in models using the QP and altered H-inverses may be inseparable leading to potential biases in genetic trends. Models using the EUPG and MF H-inverses showed no genetic trend biases. These 2 H-inverses yielded the same genomic EBV (GEBV). The predictive ability and inflation of GEBVs from young genotyped animals were nearly identical among models using the QP, altered, EUPG, and MF H-inverses. Although the choice of H-inverse in real applications with enough data may not result in biased genetic trends, the EUPG and MF H-inverses are to be preferred because of theoretical justification and possibility to reduce biases.
  • |*Genome[MESH]
  • |*Models, Genetic[MESH]
  • |Animals[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Genomics[MESH]
  • |Genotype[MESH]
  • |Pedigree[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box