Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1007/s10792-021-01719-y

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s10792-021-01719-y
suck pdf from google scholar
33475906!7818066!33475906
unlimited free pdf from europmc33475906    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33475906&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid33475906      Int+Ophthalmol 2021 ; 41 (4): 1437-1443
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents during COVID-19 pandemic: clinical audit from Tanta University Hospital #MMPMID33475906
  • Moussa M; Elshorbagy MS; Emarah A; Gaber R; Moussa OM; El-Bradey M; Alagorie AR; Sorour OA
  • Int Ophthalmol 2021[Apr]; 41 (4): 1437-1443 PMID33475906show ga
  • BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to provide real-life data about the effect of COVID-19 pandemic on the practice of anti-VEGF injections and to evaluate the safety of the modifications in the injection protocol imposed during the ongoing pandemic on the anatomical and functional outcome of patients. METHODS: All patients attending Tanta University hospital for receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF injections were screened. Patients who were previously deferred according to a modified protocol implemented in the hospital in response to the pandemic or who demonstrated deviation from it were included for further analysis. RESULTS: During the audit period, 83 patients attending for anti-VEGF injections were screened, of whom 40 met the abovementioned criteria and were included for analysis. In the deferred subgroup (11 eyes), predeferral mean values of logMAR best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal subfield thickness (CST) were 1 +/- 0.23 and 444.57 +/- 200.1 microm, respectively. There was no significant change when the patients returned for their deferred injections, with the mean BCVA and CST values being 0.8 +/- 0.22 and 413.71 +/- 237.7 microm, respectively (p = 0.27 and p = 0.12). Moreover, 29 patients encountered a disturbed injection schedule, particularly skipping their injection appointments due to infection fear as found in 18 patients. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has imposed pressing challenges in maintaining essential health care while ensuring the prevention of spread of infection. Although the modified injection protocol confirmed to be safe for patients, the pandemic caused deflection from the optimum practice in the form of successive skipping of appointments and delays in the processing of patient injection schedules.
  • |*COVID-19[MESH]
  • |*Diabetic Retinopathy/drug therapy[MESH]
  • |*Intravitreal Injections[MESH]
  • |*Macular Edema/drug therapy[MESH]
  • |Angiogenesis Inhibitors/*administration & dosage/therapeutic use[MESH]
  • |Bevacizumab/*administration & dosage/therapeutic use[MESH]
  • |Clinical Audit[MESH]
  • |Hospitals[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Pandemics[MESH]
  • |Treatment Outcome[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box