Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1111/php.13385 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1111/php.13385 33471372!8638665!33471372     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Photochem+Photobiol 2021 ; 97 (3): 527-531 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33471372|t=2021. Extreme Exposure to Filtered Far-UVC: A Case Study(dagger) |pdf=|usr=}}{{33471372}} gab.com Text Extreme Exposure to Filtered Far-UVC: A Case Study(dagger) JO: Photochem Photobiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33471372 #FOAvip Far-UVC devices are being commercially sold as "safe for humans" for the inactivation of SARS-CoV-2, without supporting human safety data. We felt there was a need for rapid proof-of-concept human self-exposure, to inform future controlled research and promote informed discussion. A Fitzpatrick Skin Type II individual exposed their inner forearms to large radiant exposures from a filtered Krypton-Chloride (KrCl) far-UVC system (SafeZoneUVC, Ushio Inc., Tokyo, Japan) with peak emission at 222 nm. No visible skin changes were observed at 1500 mJ cm(-2) ; whereas, skin yellowing that appeared immediately and resolved within 24 h occurred with a 6000 mJ cm(-2) exposure. No erythema was observed at any time point with exposures up to 18 000 mJ cm(-2) . These results combined with Monte Carlo Radiative Transfer computer modeling suggest that filtering longer ultraviolet wavelengths is critical for the human skin safety of far-UVC devices. This work also contributes to growing arguments for the exploration of exposure limit expansion, which would subsequently enable faster inactivation of viruses. Twit Text FOAVip Extreme Exposure to Filtered Far-UVC: A Case Study(dagger) ????Photochem Photobiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33471372 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33471372 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33471372}}</ref> Extreme Exposure to Filtered Far-UVC: A Case Study(dagger) #MMPMID33471372 Eadie E; Barnard IMR; Ibbotson SH; Wood K Photochem Photobiol 2021[May]; 97 (3): 527-531 PMID33471372show ga Far-UVC devices are being commercially sold as "safe for humans" for the inactivation of SARS-CoV-2, without supporting human safety data. We felt there was a need for rapid proof-of-concept human self-exposure, to inform future controlled research and promote informed discussion. A Fitzpatrick Skin Type II individual exposed their inner forearms to large radiant exposures from a filtered Krypton-Chloride (KrCl) far-UVC system (SafeZoneUVC, Ushio Inc., Tokyo, Japan) with peak emission at 222 nm. No visible skin changes were observed at 1500 mJ cm(-2) ; whereas, skin yellowing that appeared immediately and resolved within 24 h occurred with a 6000 mJ cm(-2) exposure. No erythema was observed at any time point with exposures up to 18 000 mJ cm(-2) . These results combined with Monte Carlo Radiative Transfer computer modeling suggest that filtering longer ultraviolet wavelengths is critical for the human skin safety of far-UVC devices. This work also contributes to growing arguments for the exploration of exposure limit expansion, which would subsequently enable faster inactivation of viruses. |Adult[MESH] |COVID-19/prevention & control[MESH] |Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Radiation Exposure/*adverse effects[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2/radiation effects[MESH] |Skin/*radiation effects[MESH]Extreme Exposure to Filtered Far-UVC: A Case Study(dagger) (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing