Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1073/pnas.2021022118 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1073/pnas.2021022118 33468656!7848624!33468656     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Proc+Natl+Acad+Sci+U+S+A 2021 ; 118 (4): ä Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33468656|t=2021. Results from a 2020 field experiment encouraging voting by mail |pdf=|usr=}}{{33468656}} gab.com Text Results from a 2020 field experiment encouraging voting by mail JO: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33468656 #FOAvip The ability to cast a mail ballot can safeguard the franchise. However, because there are often additional procedural protections to ensure that a ballot cast in person counts, voting by mail can also jeopardize people's ability to cast a recorded vote. An experiment carried out during the COVID-19 pandemic illustrates both forces. Philadelphia officials randomly sent 46,960 Philadelphia registrants postcards encouraging them to apply to vote by mail in the lead-up to the June 2020 primary election. While the intervention increased the likelihood a registrant cast a mail ballot by 0.4 percentage points (P = 0.017)-or 3%-many of these additional mail ballots counted only because a last-minute policy intervention allowed most mail ballots postmarked by Election Day to count. Twit Text FOAVip Results from a 2020 field experiment encouraging voting by mail ????Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33468656 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33468656 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33468656}}</ref> Results from a 2020 field experiment encouraging voting by mail #MMPMID33468656 Hopkins DJ; Meredith M; Chainani A; Olin N; Tse T Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021[Jan]; 118 (4): ä PMID33468656show ga The ability to cast a mail ballot can safeguard the franchise. However, because there are often additional procedural protections to ensure that a ballot cast in person counts, voting by mail can also jeopardize people's ability to cast a recorded vote. An experiment carried out during the COVID-19 pandemic illustrates both forces. Philadelphia officials randomly sent 46,960 Philadelphia registrants postcards encouraging them to apply to vote by mail in the lead-up to the June 2020 primary election. While the intervention increased the likelihood a registrant cast a mail ballot by 0.4 percentage points (P = 0.017)-or 3%-many of these additional mail ballots counted only because a last-minute policy intervention allowed most mail ballots postmarked by Election Day to count. |*Politics[MESH] |*Reminder Systems[MESH] |COVID-19/*epidemiology/psychology[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH] |Pennsylvania/epidemiology[MESH] |Postal Service[MESH]Results from a 2020 field experiment encouraging voting by mail (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing