Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102888

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102888
suck pdf from google scholar
33460980!7834572!33460980
unlimited free pdf from europmc33460980    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33460980&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid33460980      Am+J+Otolaryngol 2021 ; 42 (3): 102888
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • The FEES box: A novel barrier to contain particles during aerosol-generating procedures #MMPMID33460980
  • Ganann MG; Kitila M; Patel R; Brook CD; Pisegna JM
  • Am J Otolaryngol 2021[May]; 42 (3): 102888 PMID33460980show ga
  • PURPOSE: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) such as flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) have been deemed high-risk and in some cases restricted, indicating the need for additional personal protective equipment. The aim of this study was to erect and study a protective barrier for FEES. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PVC cube was constructed to fit over a patient while allowing for upright endoscopy. A plastic drape was fitted over the cube, and the protective barrier was subsequently named the "FEES Box." Three different particulate-generating tasks were carried out: sneezing, coughing, and spraying water from an atomizer bottle. Each task was completed within and without the FEES Box, and particulate was measured with a particle counter. The average particles/L detected during the three tasks, and baseline measurements, were statistically compared. RESULTS: Without the FEES Box in place, the sneezing and spraying tasks resulted in a statistically significant increase in particles above baseline (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively); coughing particulate never reached levels significantly higher than baseline (p = 0.230). With use of the FEES Box, there was no statistically significant increase in particles above baseline in any of the three tasks. CONCLUSION: The FEES Box effectively contained particles generated during sneezes and an atomizer spray. It would also likely mitigate coughing particulate, but coughing did not generate a significant increase in particles above baseline. Further research is warranted to test the efficacy of the FEES Box in containing particulate matter during a complete FEES procedure.
  • |*Personal Protective Equipment[MESH]
  • |Aerosols/*analysis[MESH]
  • |COVID-19/*prevention & control[MESH]
  • |Cough[MESH]
  • |Equipment Design[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Infection Control/*instrumentation[MESH]
  • |Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/*prevention & control[MESH]
  • |Laryngoscopy/*adverse effects[MESH]
  • |Particulate Matter/analysis[MESH]
  • |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box