Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1111/1753-6405.13066 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1111/1753-6405.13066 33460234!8014847!33460234     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Aust+N+Z+J+Public+Health 2021 ; 45 (2): 116-121 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33460234|t=2021. Communications in the time of a pandemic: the readability of documents for public consumption |pdf=|usr=}}{{33460234}} gab.com Text Communications in the time of a pandemic: the readability of documents for public consumption JO: Aust N Z J Public Health http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33460234 #FOAvip OBJECTIVE: Government communications in a crisis can influence public health outcomes. This research aimed to investigate if written communications of the most commonly sought sources of COVID-19 information available on the internet have readability levels commensurate with those of the general public. METHODS: Online documents from the World Health Organization (WHO), and the governments of Australia, the UK and the US were assessed for readability using an online instrument that calculated scores for the Flesch Reading Ease Score, the SMOG Index and the Readability Consensus Grade Level. RESULTS: Similar to the previous research, most documents assessed had a readability standard that was at or above the recommended grade level, and as such inaccessible to substantial portions of the general public. A one-way ANOVA with post hoc tests revealed significant differences among the data, with Australian documents significantly more difficult to read than those from the UK and US. CONCLUSIONS: Government departments need to consider their audience and monitor readability of the documents they produce to ensure that readers can understand them. Implications for public health: Health communications need to be written at a level appropriate for the targeted population in order to be fit for purpose. Twit Text FOAVip Communications in the time of a pandemic: the readability of documents for public consumption ????Aust N Z J Public Health http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33460234 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33460234 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33460234}}</ref> Communications in the time of a pandemic: the readability of documents for public consumption #MMPMID33460234 Ferguson C; Merga M; Winn S Aust N Z J Public Health 2021[Apr]; 45 (2): 116-121 PMID33460234show ga OBJECTIVE: Government communications in a crisis can influence public health outcomes. This research aimed to investigate if written communications of the most commonly sought sources of COVID-19 information available on the internet have readability levels commensurate with those of the general public. METHODS: Online documents from the World Health Organization (WHO), and the governments of Australia, the UK and the US were assessed for readability using an online instrument that calculated scores for the Flesch Reading Ease Score, the SMOG Index and the Readability Consensus Grade Level. RESULTS: Similar to the previous research, most documents assessed had a readability standard that was at or above the recommended grade level, and as such inaccessible to substantial portions of the general public. A one-way ANOVA with post hoc tests revealed significant differences among the data, with Australian documents significantly more difficult to read than those from the UK and US. CONCLUSIONS: Government departments need to consider their audience and monitor readability of the documents they produce to ensure that readers can understand them. Implications for public health: Health communications need to be written at a level appropriate for the targeted population in order to be fit for purpose. |*COVID-19[MESH] |*Comprehension[MESH] |*Health Communication[MESH] |*Health Literacy[MESH] |Australia[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH] |Reading[MESH]Communications in the time of a pandemic: the readability of documents(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing