Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1136/medethics-2020-107115 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1136/medethics-2020-107115 33441302!ä!33441302 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Med+Ethics 2021 ; 47 (9): 645-646 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33441302|t=2021. Red herrings, circuit-breakers and ageism in the COVID-19 debate |pdf=|usr=}}{{33441302}} gab.com Text Red herrings, circuit-breakers and ageism in the COVID-19 debate JO: J Med Ethics http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33441302 #FOAvip In their recent paper 'Why lockdown of the elderly is not ageist and why levelling down equality is wrong' Savulescu and Cameron attempt to argue the case for subjecting the 'elderly' to limits not imposed on other generations. We argue that selective lockdown of the elderly is unnecessary and cruel, as well as discriminatory, and that this group may suffer more than others in similar circumstances. Further, it constitutes an unjustifiable deprivation of liberty. Twit Text FOAVip Red herrings, circuit-breakers and ageism in the COVID-19 debate ????J Med Ethics http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33441302 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33441302 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33441302}}</ref> Red herrings, circuit-breakers and ageism in the COVID-19 debate #MMPMID33441302 Lawrence DR; Harris J J Med Ethics 2021[Sep]; 47 (9): 645-646 PMID33441302show ga In their recent paper 'Why lockdown of the elderly is not ageist and why levelling down equality is wrong' Savulescu and Cameron attempt to argue the case for subjecting the 'elderly' to limits not imposed on other generations. We argue that selective lockdown of the elderly is unnecessary and cruel, as well as discriminatory, and that this group may suffer more than others in similar circumstances. Further, it constitutes an unjustifiable deprivation of liberty. |*Ageism[MESH] |*COVID-19[MESH] |Aged[MESH] |Communicable Disease Control[MESH] |Humans[MESH]Red herrings, circuit-breakers and ageism in the COVID-19 debate (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing