Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1093/trstmh/traa140 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1093/trstmh/traa140 33440007!7928561!33440007     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Trans+R+Soc+Trop+Med+Hyg 2021 ; 115 (7): 807-819 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33440007|t=2021. The benefits and costs of social distancing in high- and low-income countries |pdf=|usr=}}{{33440007}} gab.com Text The benefits and costs of social distancing in high- and low-income countries JO: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33440007 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: Widespread social distancing and lockdowns of everyday activity have been the primary policy prescription across many countries throughout the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Despite their uniformity, these measures may be differentially valuable for different countries. METHODS: We use a compartmental epidemiological model to project the spread of COVID-19 across policy scenarios in high- and low-income countries. We embed estimates of the welfare value of disease avoidance into the epidemiological projections to estimate the return to more stringent lockdown policies. RESULTS: Social distancing measures that 'flatten the curve' of the disease provide immense welfare value in upper-income countries. However, social distancing policies deliver significantly less value in lower-income countries that have younger populations, which are less vulnerable to COVID-19. Equally important, social distancing mandates a trade-off between disease risk and economic activity. Poorer people are less able to make those economic sacrifices. CONCLUSIONS: The epidemiological and welfare value of social distancing is smaller in lower-income countries and such policies may exact a heavy toll on the poorest and most vulnerable. Workers in the informal sector often lack the resources and social protections that enable them to isolate themselves until the virus passes. By limiting these households' ability to earn a living, social distancing can lead to an increase in hunger, deprivation, and related mortality and morbidity. Twit Text FOAVip The benefits and costs of social distancing in high- and low-income countries ????Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33440007 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33440007 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33440007}}</ref> The benefits and costs of social distancing in high- and low-income countries #MMPMID33440007 Barnett-Howell Z; Watson OJ; Mobarak AM Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2021[Jul]; 115 (7): 807-819 PMID33440007show ga BACKGROUND: Widespread social distancing and lockdowns of everyday activity have been the primary policy prescription across many countries throughout the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Despite their uniformity, these measures may be differentially valuable for different countries. METHODS: We use a compartmental epidemiological model to project the spread of COVID-19 across policy scenarios in high- and low-income countries. We embed estimates of the welfare value of disease avoidance into the epidemiological projections to estimate the return to more stringent lockdown policies. RESULTS: Social distancing measures that 'flatten the curve' of the disease provide immense welfare value in upper-income countries. However, social distancing policies deliver significantly less value in lower-income countries that have younger populations, which are less vulnerable to COVID-19. Equally important, social distancing mandates a trade-off between disease risk and economic activity. Poorer people are less able to make those economic sacrifices. CONCLUSIONS: The epidemiological and welfare value of social distancing is smaller in lower-income countries and such policies may exact a heavy toll on the poorest and most vulnerable. Workers in the informal sector often lack the resources and social protections that enable them to isolate themselves until the virus passes. By limiting these households' ability to earn a living, social distancing can lead to an increase in hunger, deprivation, and related mortality and morbidity. |*COVID-19[MESH] |*Physical Distancing[MESH] |Communicable Disease Control[MESH] |Cost-Benefit Analysis[MESH] |Humans[MESH]The benefits and costs of social distancing in high- and low-income co(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing