Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1186/s12904-021-00711-8 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1186/s12904-021-00711-8 33430850!7797882!33430850     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 265.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 265.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 265.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 265.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       BMC+Palliat+Care 2021 ; 20 (1): 10 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33430850|t=2021. Advanced care planning during the COVID-19 pandemic: ceiling of care decisions and their implications for observational data |pdf=|usr=}}{{33430850}} gab.com Text Advanced care planning during the COVID-19 pandemic: ceiling of care decisions and their implications for observational data JO: BMC Palliat Care http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33430850 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: Observational studies investigating risk factors in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have not considered the confounding effects of advanced care planning, such that a valid picture of risk for elderly, frail and multi-morbid patients is unknown. We aimed to report ceiling of care and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) decisions and their association with demographic and clinical characteristics as well as outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Retrospective, observational study conducted between 5th March and 7th May 2020 of all hospitalised patients with COVID-19. Ceiling of care and CPR decisions were documented using the Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) process. Unadjusted and multivariable regression analyses were used to determine factors associated with ceiling of care decisions and death during hospitalisation. RESULTS: A total of 485 patients were included, of whom 409 (84.3%) had a documented ceiling of care; level one for 208 (50.9%), level two for 75 (18.3%) and level three for 126 (30.8%). CPR decisions were documented for 451 (93.0%) of whom 336 (74.5%) were 'not for resuscitation'. Advanced age, frailty, White-European ethnicity, a diagnosis of any co-morbidity and receipt of cardiovascular medications were associated with ceiling of care decisions. In a multivariable model only advanced age (odds 0.89, 0.86-0.93 p < 0.001), frailty (odds 0.48, 0.38-0.60, p < 0.001) and the cumulative number of co-morbidities (odds 0.72, 0.52-1.0, p = 0.048) were independently associated. Death during hospitalisation was independently associated with age, frailty and requirement for level two or three care. CONCLUSION: Ceiling of care decisions were made for the majority of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, broadly in line with known predictors of poor outcomes in COVID-19, but with a focus on co-morbidities suggesting ICU admission might not be a reliable end-point for observational studies where advanced care planning is routine. Twit Text FOAVip Advanced care planning during the COVID-19 pandemic: ceiling of care decisions and their implications for observational data ????BMC Palliat Care http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33430850 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33430850 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33430850}}</ref> Advanced care planning during the COVID-19 pandemic: ceiling of care decisions and their implications for observational data #MMPMID33430850 Straw S; McGinlay M; Drozd M; Slater TA; Cowley A; Kamalathasan S; Maxwell N; Bird RA; Koshy AO; Prica M; Patel PA; Relton SD; Gierula J; Cubbon RM; Kearney MT; Witte KK BMC Palliat Care 2021[Jan]; 20 (1): 10 PMID33430850show ga BACKGROUND: Observational studies investigating risk factors in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have not considered the confounding effects of advanced care planning, such that a valid picture of risk for elderly, frail and multi-morbid patients is unknown. We aimed to report ceiling of care and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) decisions and their association with demographic and clinical characteristics as well as outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Retrospective, observational study conducted between 5th March and 7th May 2020 of all hospitalised patients with COVID-19. Ceiling of care and CPR decisions were documented using the Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) process. Unadjusted and multivariable regression analyses were used to determine factors associated with ceiling of care decisions and death during hospitalisation. RESULTS: A total of 485 patients were included, of whom 409 (84.3%) had a documented ceiling of care; level one for 208 (50.9%), level two for 75 (18.3%) and level three for 126 (30.8%). CPR decisions were documented for 451 (93.0%) of whom 336 (74.5%) were 'not for resuscitation'. Advanced age, frailty, White-European ethnicity, a diagnosis of any co-morbidity and receipt of cardiovascular medications were associated with ceiling of care decisions. In a multivariable model only advanced age (odds 0.89, 0.86-0.93 p < 0.001), frailty (odds 0.48, 0.38-0.60, p < 0.001) and the cumulative number of co-morbidities (odds 0.72, 0.52-1.0, p = 0.048) were independently associated. Death during hospitalisation was independently associated with age, frailty and requirement for level two or three care. CONCLUSION: Ceiling of care decisions were made for the majority of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, broadly in line with known predictors of poor outcomes in COVID-19, but with a focus on co-morbidities suggesting ICU admission might not be a reliable end-point for observational studies where advanced care planning is routine. |*Advance Care Planning[MESH] |*Clinical Decision-Making[MESH] |Adult[MESH] |Aged[MESH] |Aged, 80 and over[MESH] |COVID-19/*therapy[MESH] |Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Life Support Care[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Middle Aged[MESH]Advanced care planning during the COVID-19 pandemic: ceiling of care d(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing