Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.5195/jmla.2021.1020 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.5195/jmla.2021.1020 33424467!7772974!33424467     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Med+Libr+Assoc 2021 ; 109 (1): 75-83 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33424467|t=2021. Health websites on COVID-19: are they readable and credible enough to help public self-care?|pdf=|usr=}}{{33424467}} gab.com Text Health websites on COVID-19: are they readable and credible enough to help public self-care JO: J Med Libr Assoc http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33424467 #FOAvip OBJECTIVE: There are concerns about nonscientific and/or unclear information on the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) that is available on the Internet. Furthermore, people's ability to understand health information varies and depends on their skills in reading and interpreting information. This study aims to evaluate the readability and creditability of websites with COVID-19-related information. METHODS: The search terms "coronavirus," "COVID," and "COVID-19" were input into Google. The websites of the first thirty results for each search term were evaluated in terms of their credibility and readability using the Health On the Net Foundation code of conduct (HONcode) and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), Gunning Fog, and Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRE) scales, respectively. RESULTS: The readability of COVID-19-related health information on websites was suitable for high school graduates or college students and, thus, was far above the recommended readability level. Most websites that were examined (87.2%) had not been officially certified by HONcode. There was no significant difference in the readability scores of websites with and without HONcode certification. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that organizations should improve the readability of their websites and provide information that more people can understand. This could lead to greater health literacy, less health anxiety, and the provision of better preventive information about the disease. Twit Text FOAVip Health websites on COVID-19: are they readable and credible enough to help public self-care ????J Med Libr Assoc http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33424467 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33424467 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33424467}}</ref> Health websites on COVID-19: are they readable and credible enough to help public self-care? #MMPMID33424467 Valizadeh-Haghi S; Khazaal Y; Rahmatizadeh S J Med Libr Assoc 2021[Jan]; 109 (1): 75-83 PMID33424467show ga OBJECTIVE: There are concerns about nonscientific and/or unclear information on the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) that is available on the Internet. Furthermore, people's ability to understand health information varies and depends on their skills in reading and interpreting information. This study aims to evaluate the readability and creditability of websites with COVID-19-related information. METHODS: The search terms "coronavirus," "COVID," and "COVID-19" were input into Google. The websites of the first thirty results for each search term were evaluated in terms of their credibility and readability using the Health On the Net Foundation code of conduct (HONcode) and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), Gunning Fog, and Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRE) scales, respectively. RESULTS: The readability of COVID-19-related health information on websites was suitable for high school graduates or college students and, thus, was far above the recommended readability level. Most websites that were examined (87.2%) had not been officially certified by HONcode. There was no significant difference in the readability scores of websites with and without HONcode certification. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that organizations should improve the readability of their websites and provide information that more people can understand. This could lead to greater health literacy, less health anxiety, and the provision of better preventive information about the disease. |*Comprehension[MESH] |*Data Accuracy[MESH] |*Internet[MESH] |Adult[MESH] |Aged[MESH] |Aged, 80 and over[MESH] |COVID-19/*nursing/physiopathology[MESH] |Consumer Health Information/*methods[MESH] |Databases, Factual/*statistics & numerical data[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Health Literacy/*methods[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Middle Aged[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]Health websites on COVID-19: are they readable and credible enough to (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing