Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1007/s10140-020-01889-9

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s10140-020-01889-9
suck pdf from google scholar
33420529!7793387!33420529
unlimited free pdf from europmc33420529    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid33420529      Emerg+Radiol 2021 ; 28 (2): 339-347
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • The effect of COVID-19 on emergency department imaging: what can we learn? #MMPMID33420529
  • Sharperson C; Hanna TN; Herr KD; Zygmont ME; Gerard RL; Johnson JO
  • Emerg Radiol 2021[Apr]; 28 (2): 339-347 PMID33420529show ga
  • PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department (ED) imaging. METHODS: This retrospective study included all ED visits at a four-hospital academic health system in two matched 5-week periods. Demographic information, COVID-19 status, and disposition were reviewed. Type of imaging, acquisition time, and radiology reports were analyzed. Significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: A 43.2% decrease in ED visits and 12% reduction in overall ED imaging occurred during the pandemic period. Mean age was unchanged, but a shift in gender and racial characteristics was observed (p < 0.001). In the pandemic period, COVID-19 ED patients were older (61.8 +/- 16.9 years, p < 0.001) and more likely to be Black (64.2%; p < 0.001) than non-COVID-19 patients. Imaging per ED encounter increased to 2.4 +/- 2.8 exams from 1.7 +/- 1.1 (p < 0.001). Radiography increased (57.2% vs. 52.4%) as a fraction of total ED imaging, while computed tomography (23.4% vs. 27.2%) and ultrasound (8.5% vs. 9.6%) decreased (pre-pandemic vs. pandemic). COVID-19 ED patients underwent CT and US at a lower rate (11.5% and 5.4%) than non-COVID-19 patients (25.4% and 9.1%). The proportion of imaging study reports concluding "no disease" or "no acute disease" decreased from 56.7 to 40.6% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic led to a significant reduction in ED visits, a shift in patient demographics, and a significant decrease in imaging volume. Additional impact included a significant increase in the proportion of positive imaging studies.
  • |Adolescent[MESH]
  • |Adult[MESH]
  • |Aged[MESH]
  • |Aged, 80 and over[MESH]
  • |COVID-19/*epidemiology[MESH]
  • |Diagnostic Imaging/*statistics & numerical data[MESH]
  • |Emergency Service, Hospital/*statistics & numerical data[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Georgia/epidemiology[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Middle Aged[MESH]
  • |Pandemics[MESH]
  • |Retrospective Studies[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box