Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.3390/diagnostics11010078 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3390/diagnostics11010078 33418886!7825051!33418886     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Diagnostics+(Basel) 2021 ; 11 (1): ä Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33418886|t=2021. Comparison of Five Serological Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies |pdf=|usr=}}{{33418886}} gab.com Text Comparison of Five Serological Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies JO: Diagnostics (Basel) http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33418886 #FOAvip Serological assays can contribute to the estimation of population proportions with previous immunologically relevant contact with the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. In this study, we compared five commercially available diagnostic assays for the diagnostic identification of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies. Depending on the assessed immunoglobulin subclass, recorded sensitivity ranged from 17.0% to 81.9% with best results for immunoglobulin G. Specificity with blood donor sera ranged from 90.2% to 100%, with sera from EBV patients it ranged from 84.3% to 100%. Agreement from fair to nearly perfect was recorded depending on the immunoglobulin class between the assays, the with best results being found for immunoglobulin G. Only for this immunoglobulin class was the association between later sample acquisition times (about three weeks after first positive PCR results) and positive serological results in COVID-19 patients confirmed. In conclusion, acceptable and comparable reliability for the assessed immunoglobulin G-specific assays could be shown, while there is still room for improvement regarding the reliability of the assays targeting the other immunoglobulin classes. Twit Text FOAVip Comparison of Five Serological Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies ????Diagnostics (Basel) http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33418886 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33418886 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33418886}}</ref> Comparison of Five Serological Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies #MMPMID33418886 Dorschug A; Schwanbeck J; Hahn A; Hillebrecht A; Blaschke S; Mese K; Gross U; Dierks S; Frickmann H; Zautner AE Diagnostics (Basel) 2021[Jan]; 11 (1): ä PMID33418886show ga Serological assays can contribute to the estimation of population proportions with previous immunologically relevant contact with the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. In this study, we compared five commercially available diagnostic assays for the diagnostic identification of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies. Depending on the assessed immunoglobulin subclass, recorded sensitivity ranged from 17.0% to 81.9% with best results for immunoglobulin G. Specificity with blood donor sera ranged from 90.2% to 100%, with sera from EBV patients it ranged from 84.3% to 100%. Agreement from fair to nearly perfect was recorded depending on the immunoglobulin class between the assays, the with best results being found for immunoglobulin G. Only for this immunoglobulin class was the association between later sample acquisition times (about three weeks after first positive PCR results) and positive serological results in COVID-19 patients confirmed. In conclusion, acceptable and comparable reliability for the assessed immunoglobulin G-specific assays could be shown, while there is still room for improvement regarding the reliability of the assays targeting the other immunoglobulin classes. äComparison of Five Serological Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing