Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/ 33416516!ä!33416516 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Clin+Ethics 2021 ; 32 (1): 38-47 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33416516|t=2021. An Ethical Analysis of Hospital Visitor Restrictions and Masking Requirements During the COVID-19 Pandemic |pdf=|usr=}}{{33416516}} gab.com Text An Ethical Analysis of Hospital Visitor Restrictions and Masking Requirements During the COVID-19 Pandemic JO: J Clin Ethics http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33416516 #FOAvip Nonpharmaceutical interventions to minimize the transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 are necessary because we currently lack a vaccine or specific treatments. Healthcare facilities have adopted visitor restrictions and masking requirements. These interventions should be evaluated as public health measures, focusing on their efficacy, the availability of less-restrictive alternatives, and the minimization of the burdens and their balance with the benefits. These interventions, as well as exceptions, can be justified by the same analysis. For example, visitor restrictions are sound, as are exceptions for women in labor, adults with disabilities, minor children, and individuals who are dying. In implementing these policies, specific rules are preferable to general principles because they are more efficient and reduce possible bias. There should, however, be appeal mechanisms and retrospective review processes. Evaluating requests for medical exemptions to masking requirements is particularly difficult, given the prevalence of nonmedical objections, false claims of medical exemptions, and a lack of objective medical criteria. Requiring written statements by licensed healthcare providers that undergo subsequent substantive review may therefore be justified. Twit Text FOAVip An Ethical Analysis of Hospital Visitor Restrictions and Masking Requirements During the COVID-19 Pandemic ????J Clin Ethics http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33416516 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33416516 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33416516}}</ref> An Ethical Analysis of Hospital Visitor Restrictions and Masking Requirements During the COVID-19 Pandemic #MMPMID33416516 Antommaria AHM; Monhollen L; Schaffzin JK J Clin Ethics 2021[Spr]; 32 (1): 38-47 PMID33416516show ga Nonpharmaceutical interventions to minimize the transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 are necessary because we currently lack a vaccine or specific treatments. Healthcare facilities have adopted visitor restrictions and masking requirements. These interventions should be evaluated as public health measures, focusing on their efficacy, the availability of less-restrictive alternatives, and the minimization of the burdens and their balance with the benefits. These interventions, as well as exceptions, can be justified by the same analysis. For example, visitor restrictions are sound, as are exceptions for women in labor, adults with disabilities, minor children, and individuals who are dying. In implementing these policies, specific rules are preferable to general principles because they are more efficient and reduce possible bias. There should, however, be appeal mechanisms and retrospective review processes. Evaluating requests for medical exemptions to masking requirements is particularly difficult, given the prevalence of nonmedical objections, false claims of medical exemptions, and a lack of objective medical criteria. Requiring written statements by licensed healthcare providers that undergo subsequent substantive review may therefore be justified. |*Visitors to Patients[MESH] |COVID-19/*prevention & control[MESH] |Communicable Disease Control/*instrumentation[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Masks/*ethics[MESH] |Pandemics[MESH]An Ethical Analysis of Hospital Visitor Restrictions and Masking Requi(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing