Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1371/journal.pone.0241190

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1371/journal.pone.0241190
suck pdf from google scholar
33406134!7787535!33406134
unlimited free pdf from europmc33406134    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid33406134      PLoS+One 2021 ; 16 (1): e0241190
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • 80 questions for UK biological security #MMPMID33406134
  • Kemp L; Aldridge DC; Booy O; Bower H; Browne D; Burgmann M; Burt A; Cunningham AA; Dando M; Dick JTA; Dye C; Weiss Evans S; Gallardo B; Godfray HCJ; Goodfellow I; Gubbins S; Holt LA; Jones KE; Kandil H; Martin P; McCaughan M; McLeish C; Meany T; Millett K; OhEigeartaigh SS; Patron NJ; Rhodes C; Roy HE; Shackelford G; Smith D; Spence N; Steiner H; Sundaram LS; Voeneky S; Walker JR; Watkins H; Whitby S; Wood J; Sutherland WJ
  • PLoS One 2021[]; 16 (1): e0241190 PMID33406134show ga
  • Multiple national and international trends and drivers are radically changing what biological security means for the United Kingdom (UK). New technologies present novel opportunities and challenges, and globalisation has created new pathways and increased the speed, volume and routes by which organisms can spread. The UK Biological Security Strategy (2018) acknowledges the importance of research on biological security in the UK. Given the breadth of potential research, a targeted agenda identifying the questions most critical to effective and coordinated progress in different disciplines of biological security is required. We used expert elicitation to generate 80 policy-relevant research questions considered by participants to have the greatest impact on UK biological security. Drawing on a collaboratively-developed set of 450 questions, proposed by 41 experts from academia, industry and the UK government (consulting 168 additional experts) we subdivided the final 80 questions into six categories: bioengineering; communication and behaviour; disease threats (including pandemics); governance and policy; invasive alien species; and securing biological materials and securing against misuse. Initially, the questions were ranked through a voting process and then reduced and refined to 80 during a one-day workshop with 35 participants from a variety of disciplines. Consistently emerging themes included: the nature of current and potential biological security threats, the efficacy of existing management actions, and the most appropriate future options. The resulting questions offer a research agenda for biological security in the UK that can assist the targeting of research resources and inform the implementation of the UK Biological Security Strategy. These questions include research that could aid with the mitigation of Covid-19, and preparation for the next pandemic. We hope that our structured and rigorous approach to creating a biological security research agenda will be replicated in other countries and regions. The world, not just the UK, is in need of a thoughtful approach to directing biological security research to tackle the emerging issues.
  • |Bioterrorism/prevention & control[MESH]
  • |COVID-19/prevention & control[MESH]
  • |Clinical Governance/trends[MESH]
  • |Communication[MESH]
  • |Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control/statistics & numerical data[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Pandemics/*prevention & control/statistics & numerical data[MESH]
  • |Policy[MESH]
  • |SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity[MESH]
  • |Security Measures/statistics & numerical data/*trends[MESH]
  • |Surveys and Questionnaires[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box