Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1007/s11019-020-09999-4 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s11019-020-09999-4 33398486!7780900!33398486     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Med+Health+Care+Philos 2021 ; 24 (2): 205-211 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33398486|t=2021. Withdrawing critical care from patients in a triage situation |pdf=|usr=}}{{33398486}} gab.com Text Withdrawing critical care from patients in a triage situation JO: Med Health Care Philos http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33398486 #FOAvip The advent of COVID-19 has been the occasion for a renewed interest in the principles governing triage when the number of critically ill patients exceeds the healthcare infrastructure's capacity in a given location. Some scholars advocate that it would be morally acceptable in a crisis to withdraw resources like life support and ICU beds from one patient in favor of another, if, in the judgment of medical personnel, the other patient has a significantly better prognosis. The paper examines the arguments for and against this approach from the point of view of natural law theory, especially using the principle of double effect. We conclude that it is inadmissible to withdraw life-saving medical interventions from patients who are still benefiting from them, on the sole grounds that other patients might benefit more. Those who are currently using such technology should only interrupt their treatment if, in the judgment of medical personnel and, if possible, taking into account the wishes and needs of the patient and his family, the treatment is deemed futile, burdensome, or disproportionate. Twit Text FOAVip Withdrawing critical care from patients in a triage situation ????Med Health Care Philos http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33398486 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33398486 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33398486}}</ref> Withdrawing critical care from patients in a triage situation #MMPMID33398486 Tham J; Melahn L; Baggot M Med Health Care Philos 2021[Jun]; 24 (2): 205-211 PMID33398486show ga The advent of COVID-19 has been the occasion for a renewed interest in the principles governing triage when the number of critically ill patients exceeds the healthcare infrastructure's capacity in a given location. Some scholars advocate that it would be morally acceptable in a crisis to withdraw resources like life support and ICU beds from one patient in favor of another, if, in the judgment of medical personnel, the other patient has a significantly better prognosis. The paper examines the arguments for and against this approach from the point of view of natural law theory, especially using the principle of double effect. We conclude that it is inadmissible to withdraw life-saving medical interventions from patients who are still benefiting from them, on the sole grounds that other patients might benefit more. Those who are currently using such technology should only interrupt their treatment if, in the judgment of medical personnel and, if possible, taking into account the wishes and needs of the patient and his family, the treatment is deemed futile, burdensome, or disproportionate. |*Critical Care/ethics[MESH] |*Triage/ethics/methods[MESH] |*Withholding Treatment/ethics[MESH] |COVID-19/epidemiology/*therapy[MESH] |Humans[MESH]Withdrawing critical care from patients in a triage situation (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing