Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.4014/jmb.2009.09006 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.4014/jmb.2009.09006 33397829!9705847!33397829     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Microbiol+Biotechnol 2021 ; 31 (3): 358-367 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33397829|t=2021. Comparison of Digital PCR and Quantitative PCR with Various SARS-CoV-2 Primer-Probe Sets |pdf=|usr=}}{{33397829}} gab.com Text Comparison of Digital PCR and Quantitative PCR with Various SARS-CoV-2 Primer-Probe Sets JO: J Microbiol Biotechnol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33397829 #FOAvip The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as an international health emergency. Current diagnostic tests are based on the reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) method, which is the gold standard test that involves the amplification of viral RNA. However, the RT-qPCR assay has limitations in terms of sensitivity and quantification. In this study, we tested both qPCR and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) to detect low amounts of viral RNA. The cycle threshold (C(T)) of the viral RNA by RT-PCR significantly varied according to the sequences of the primer and probe sets with in vitro transcript (IVT) RNA or viral RNA as templates, whereas the copy number of the viral RNA by ddPCR was effectively quantified with IVT RNA, cultured viral RNA, and RNA from clinical samples. Furthermore, the clinical samples were assayed via both methods, and the sensitivity of the ddPCR was determined to be equal to or more than that of the RT-qPCR. However, the ddPCR assay is more suitable for determining the copy number of reference materials. These findings suggest that the qPCR assay with the ddPCR defined reference materials could be used as a highly sensitive and compatible diagnostic method for viral RNA detection. Twit Text FOAVip Comparison of Digital PCR and Quantitative PCR with Various SARS-CoV-2 Primer-Probe Sets ????J Microbiol Biotechnol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33397829 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33397829 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33397829}}</ref> Comparison of Digital PCR and Quantitative PCR with Various SARS-CoV-2 Primer-Probe Sets #MMPMID33397829 Park C; Lee J; Hassan ZU; Ku KB; Kim SJ; Kim HG; Park EC; Park GS; Park D; Baek SH; Park D; Lee J; Jeon S; Kim S; Lee CS; Yoo HM; Kim S J Microbiol Biotechnol 2021[Mar]; 31 (3): 358-367 PMID33397829show ga The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as an international health emergency. Current diagnostic tests are based on the reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) method, which is the gold standard test that involves the amplification of viral RNA. However, the RT-qPCR assay has limitations in terms of sensitivity and quantification. In this study, we tested both qPCR and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) to detect low amounts of viral RNA. The cycle threshold (C(T)) of the viral RNA by RT-PCR significantly varied according to the sequences of the primer and probe sets with in vitro transcript (IVT) RNA or viral RNA as templates, whereas the copy number of the viral RNA by ddPCR was effectively quantified with IVT RNA, cultured viral RNA, and RNA from clinical samples. Furthermore, the clinical samples were assayed via both methods, and the sensitivity of the ddPCR was determined to be equal to or more than that of the RT-qPCR. However, the ddPCR assay is more suitable for determining the copy number of reference materials. These findings suggest that the qPCR assay with the ddPCR defined reference materials could be used as a highly sensitive and compatible diagnostic method for viral RNA detection. |Animals[MESH] |COVID-19/*diagnosis/virology[MESH] |Cell Line[MESH] |Chlorocebus aethiops[MESH] |Gene Dosage/genetics[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Nucleic Acid Probes/*genetics[MESH] |RNA, Viral/genetics[MESH] |Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/*methods[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2/*genetics[MESH] |Sensitivity and Specificity[MESH]Comparison of Digital PCR and Quantitative PCR with Various SARS-CoV-2(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing