Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.3389/fpubh.2020.602988 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3389/fpubh.2020.602988 33392140!7775575!33392140     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Front+Public+Health 2020 ; 8 (ä): 602988 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33392140|t=2020. Medical Liability in Cancer Care During COVID-19 Pandemic: Heroes or Guilty?|pdf=|usr=}}{{33392140}} gab.com Text Medical Liability in Cancer Care During COVID-19 Pandemic: Heroes or Guilty JO: Front Public Health http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33392140 #FOAvip Background: The COVID-19 outbreak rapidly became a public health emergency affecting particularly the frail category as cancer patients. This led oncologists to radical changes in patient management, facing the unprecedent issue whether treatments in oncology could be postponed without compromising their efficacy. Purpose: To discuss legal implications in oncology practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. Perspective: Treatment delay is not always feasible in oncology where the timing often plays a key role and may impact significantly in prognosis. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the oncologists were found between the anvil and the hammer, on the one hand the need to treat cancer patients aiming to improve clinical benefits, and on the other hand the goal to reduce the risk of COVID-19 infection avoiding or delaying immunosuppressive treatments and hospital exposure. Therefore, two rising scenarios with possible implications in both criminal and civil law are emerging. Firstly, oncologists may be "accused" of having delayed or omitted the diagnosis and/or treatments with consequent worsening of patients' outcome. Secondly, oncologists can be blamed for having exposed patients to hospital environment considered at risk for COVID-19 transmission. Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, clinical decision making should be well-balanced through a careful examination between clinical performance status, age, comorbidities, aim of the treatment, and the potential risk of COVID-19 infection in order to avoid the risk of suboptimal cancer care with potential legal repercussion. Moreover, all cases should be discussed in the oncology team or in the tumor board in order to share the best strategy to adopt case by case. Twit Text FOAVip Medical Liability in Cancer Care During COVID-19 Pandemic: Heroes or Guilty ????Front Public Health http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33392140 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33392140 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33392140}}</ref> Medical Liability in Cancer Care During COVID-19 Pandemic: Heroes or Guilty? #MMPMID33392140 Barranco R; Messina C; Bonsignore A; Cattrini C; Ventura F Front Public Health 2020[]; 8 (ä): 602988 PMID33392140show ga Background: The COVID-19 outbreak rapidly became a public health emergency affecting particularly the frail category as cancer patients. This led oncologists to radical changes in patient management, facing the unprecedent issue whether treatments in oncology could be postponed without compromising their efficacy. Purpose: To discuss legal implications in oncology practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. Perspective: Treatment delay is not always feasible in oncology where the timing often plays a key role and may impact significantly in prognosis. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the oncologists were found between the anvil and the hammer, on the one hand the need to treat cancer patients aiming to improve clinical benefits, and on the other hand the goal to reduce the risk of COVID-19 infection avoiding or delaying immunosuppressive treatments and hospital exposure. Therefore, two rising scenarios with possible implications in both criminal and civil law are emerging. Firstly, oncologists may be "accused" of having delayed or omitted the diagnosis and/or treatments with consequent worsening of patients' outcome. Secondly, oncologists can be blamed for having exposed patients to hospital environment considered at risk for COVID-19 transmission. Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, clinical decision making should be well-balanced through a careful examination between clinical performance status, age, comorbidities, aim of the treatment, and the potential risk of COVID-19 infection in order to avoid the risk of suboptimal cancer care with potential legal repercussion. Moreover, all cases should be discussed in the oncology team or in the tumor board in order to share the best strategy to adopt case by case. |Adult[MESH] |COVID-19/*economics[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Guilt[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Liability, Legal/*economics[MESH] |Male[MESH] |Malpractice/*economics[MESH] |Middle Aged[MESH] |Neoplasms/*economics/*therapy[MESH] |Oncologists/*economics/statistics & numerical data[MESH] |Pandemics/*economics[MESH]Medical Liability in Cancer Care During COVID-19 Pandemic: Heroes or G(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing