Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.114049 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.114049 33387561!7833528!33387561     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 265.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 265.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Virol+Methods 2021 ; 290 (ä): 114049 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33387561|t=2021. Does sampling saliva increase detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR? Comparing saliva with oro-nasopharyngeal swabs |pdf=|usr=}}{{33387561}} gab.com Text Does sampling saliva increase detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR Comparing saliva with oro-nasopharyngeal swabs JO: J Virol Methods http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33387561 #FOAvip The gold standard method in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is the detection of viral RNA in the nasopharyngeal sample by RT-PCR. Recently, saliva samples have been suggested as an alternative sample. In the present study, we aimed to compare RT-PCR results in nasopharyngeal, oro-nasopharyngeal and saliva samples of COVID-19 patients. 98 of 200 patients were positive in RT-PCR analysis performed before the hospitalization. On day 0, at least one sample was positive in 67 % of 98 patients. The positivity rate was 83 % for both oro-nasopharyngeal and nasopharyngeal samples, while it was 63 % for saliva samples (p?<?0.001). On day 5, RT-PCR was performed in 59 patients, 34 % had at least one positive result. The positivity rate was 55 % for both saliva and nasopharyngeal samples, while it was 60 % for oro-nasopharyngeal samples. Our study shows that the sampling saliva does not increase the sensitivity of RT-PCR tests at the early stages of infection. However, on the 5th day, viral RNA detection rates in saliva were similar to nasopharyngeal and oro-nasopharyngeal samples. In conclusion, we suggest that, in patients receiving treatment, RT-PCR in saliva, in addition to the standard samples, is important to determine the isolation period and control transmission. Twit Text FOAVip Does sampling saliva increase detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR Comparing saliva with oro-nasopharyngeal swabs ????J Virol Methods http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33387561 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33387561 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33387561}}</ref> Does sampling saliva increase detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR? Comparing saliva with oro-nasopharyngeal swabs #MMPMID33387561 Dogan OA; Kose B; Agaoglu NB; Yildiz J; Alkurt G; Demirkol YK; Irvem A; Doganay GD; Doganay L J Virol Methods 2021[Apr]; 290 (ä): 114049 PMID33387561show ga The gold standard method in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is the detection of viral RNA in the nasopharyngeal sample by RT-PCR. Recently, saliva samples have been suggested as an alternative sample. In the present study, we aimed to compare RT-PCR results in nasopharyngeal, oro-nasopharyngeal and saliva samples of COVID-19 patients. 98 of 200 patients were positive in RT-PCR analysis performed before the hospitalization. On day 0, at least one sample was positive in 67 % of 98 patients. The positivity rate was 83 % for both oro-nasopharyngeal and nasopharyngeal samples, while it was 63 % for saliva samples (p? |*COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing[MESH] |COVID-19/*diagnosis[MESH] |Cross-Sectional Studies[MESH] |Diagnostic Tests, Routine[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Nasopharynx/*virology[MESH] |RNA, Viral/genetics/isolation & purification[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2/genetics/*isolation & purification[MESH] |Saliva/*virology[MESH] |Sensitivity and Specificity[MESH] |Specimen Handling[MESH]Does sampling saliva increase detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR? Compa(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing