Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa893

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa893
suck pdf from google scholar
33321517!7953962!33321517
unlimited free pdf from europmc33321517    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33321517&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid33321517      Eur+Heart+J 2021 ; 42 (5): 520-528
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Ventricular arrhythmia burden during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic #MMPMID33321517
  • O'Shea CJ; Thomas G; Middeldorp ME; Harper C; Elliott AD; Ray N; Lau DH; Campbell K; Sanders P
  • Eur Heart J 2021[Feb]; 42 (5): 520-528 PMID33321517show ga
  • AIMS: Our objective was to determine the ventricular arrhythmia burden in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients during COVID-19. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this multicentre, observational, cohort study over a 100-day period during the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA, we assessed ventricular arrhythmias in ICD patients from 20 centres in 13 states, via remote monitoring. Comparison was via a 100-day control period (late 2019) and seasonal control period (early 2019). The primary outcome was the impact of COVID-19 on ventricular arrhythmia burden. The secondary outcome was correlation with COVID-19 incidence. During the COVID-19 period, 5963 ICD patients underwent remote monitoring, with 16 942 episodes of treated ventricular arrhythmias (2.8 events per 100 patient-days). Ventricular arrhythmia burden progressively declined during COVID-19 (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients with ventricular arrhythmias amongst the high COVID-19 incidence states was significantly reduced compared with those in low incidence states [odds ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-0.69, P < 0.001]. Comparing patients remotely monitored during both COVID-19 and control periods (n = 2458), significantly fewer ventricular arrhythmias occurred during COVID-19 [incident rate ratio (IRR) 0.68, 95% CI 0.58-0.79, P < 0.001]. This difference persisted when comparing the 1719 patients monitored during both the COVID-19 and seasonal control periods (IRR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56-0.85, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: During COVID-19, there was a 32% reduction in ventricular arrhythmias needing device therapies, coinciding with measures of social isolation. There was a 39% reduction in the proportion of patients with ventricular arrhythmias in states with higher COVID-19 incidence. These findings highlight the potential role of real-life stressors in ventricular arrhythmia burden in individuals with ICDs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry; URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/; Unique Identifier: ACTRN12620000641998.
  • |*COVID-19/epidemiology/prevention & control[MESH]
  • |*Defibrillators, Implantable[MESH]
  • |Adult[MESH]
  • |Aged[MESH]
  • |Arrhythmias, Cardiac/*epidemiology/etiology/therapy[MESH]
  • |Cost of Illness[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Incidence[MESH]
  • |Logistic Models[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Middle Aged[MESH]
  • |Monitoring, Physiologic[MESH]
  • |Pandemics[MESH]
  • |Physical Distancing[MESH]
  • |Protective Factors[MESH]
  • |Registries[MESH]
  • |Risk Factors[MESH]
  • |Stress, Psychological[MESH]
  • |Telemedicine[MESH]
  • |United States/epidemiology[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box