Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.3390/ijerph17239096 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3390/ijerph17239096 33291511!7730003!33291511     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33291511&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215       Int+J+Environ+Res+Public+Health 2020 ; 17 (23): ? Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33291511|t=2020. Investigating the Psychological Impact of COVID-19 among Healthcare Workers: A Meta-Analysis |pdf=|usr=}}{{33291511}} gab.com Text Investigating the Psychological Impact of COVID-19 among Healthcare Workers: A Meta-Analysis JO: Int J Environ Res Public Health http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33291511 #FOAvip Previous meta-analyses were conducted during the initial phases of the COVID-19 pandemic, which utilized a smaller pool of data. The current meta-analysis aims to provide additional (and updated) evidence related to the psychological impact among healthcare workers. The search strategy was developed by a medical librarian and bibliographical databases, including Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus were searched for studies examining the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the psychological health of healthcare workers. Articles were screened by three reviewers. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed by I(2) statistic. The random-effects model was utilized to obtain the pooled prevalence. A subgroup analysis by region, gender, quality of study, assessment methods, healthcare profession, and exposure was performed. Publication bias was assessed by Funnel plot and Egger linear regression test. Sixty-five studies met the inclusion criteria and the total sample constituted 79,437 participants. The pooled prevalence of anxiety, depression, stress, post-traumatic stress syndrome, insomnia, psychological distress, and burnout was 34.4%, 31.8%, 40.3%, 11.4%, 27.8%, 46.1%, and 37.4% respectively. The subgroup analysis indicated higher anxiety and depression prevalence among females, nurses, and frontline responders than males, doctors, and second-line healthcare workers. This study highlights the need for designing a targeted intervention to improve resilience and foster post-traumatic growth among frontline responders. Twit Text FOAVip Investigating the Psychological Impact of COVID-19 among Healthcare Workers: A Meta-Analysis ????Int J Environ Res Public Health http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33291511 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33291511 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33291511}}</ref> Investigating the Psychological Impact of COVID-19 among Healthcare Workers: A Meta-Analysis #MMPMID33291511 Batra K; Singh TP; Sharma M; Batra R; Schvaneveldt N Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020[Dec]; 17 (23): ? PMID33291511show ga Previous meta-analyses were conducted during the initial phases of the COVID-19 pandemic, which utilized a smaller pool of data. The current meta-analysis aims to provide additional (and updated) evidence related to the psychological impact among healthcare workers. The search strategy was developed by a medical librarian and bibliographical databases, including Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus were searched for studies examining the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the psychological health of healthcare workers. Articles were screened by three reviewers. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed by I(2) statistic. The random-effects model was utilized to obtain the pooled prevalence. A subgroup analysis by region, gender, quality of study, assessment methods, healthcare profession, and exposure was performed. Publication bias was assessed by Funnel plot and Egger linear regression test. Sixty-five studies met the inclusion criteria and the total sample constituted 79,437 participants. The pooled prevalence of anxiety, depression, stress, post-traumatic stress syndrome, insomnia, psychological distress, and burnout was 34.4%, 31.8%, 40.3%, 11.4%, 27.8%, 46.1%, and 37.4% respectively. The subgroup analysis indicated higher anxiety and depression prevalence among females, nurses, and frontline responders than males, doctors, and second-line healthcare workers. This study highlights the need for designing a targeted intervention to improve resilience and foster post-traumatic growth among frontline responders. |*Pandemics[MESH] |Anxiety/epidemiology[MESH] |COVID-19/*psychology[MESH] |Depression/epidemiology[MESH] |Female[MESH] |Health Personnel/*psychology[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Male[MESH]Investigating the Psychological Impact of COVID-19 among Healthcare Wo(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing