Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1363/psrh.12163

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1363/psrh.12163
suck pdf from google scholar
33289197!7753746!33289197
unlimited free pdf from europmc33289197    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid33289197      Perspect+Sex+Reprod+Health 2020 ; 52 (4): 217-225
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • COVID-19 and Independent Abortion Providers: Findings from a Rapid-Response Survey #MMPMID33289197
  • Roberts SCM; Schroeder R; Joffe C
  • Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2020[Dec]; 52 (4): 217-225 PMID33289197show ga
  • CONTEXT: The ways in which the COVID-19 pandemic has affected abortion providers and abortion care, and the strategies clinics are adopting to navigate the pandemic, have not been well documented. METHODS: In April-May 2020, representatives from 103 independent abortion clinics (i.e., those not affiliated with Planned Parenthood) completed a survey that included close-ended questions about how the pandemic, the public health response, and designations of abortion as a nonessential service had affected their clinic, as well as open-ended questions about the pandemic's impact. Analyses were primarily descriptive but included an exploration of regional variation. RESULTS: All U.S. regions were represented in the sample. At 51% of clinics, clinicians or staff had been unable to work because of the pandemic or public health responses. Temporary closures were more common among clinics in the South (35%) and Midwest (21%) than in the Northeast and West (5% each). More than half of clinics had canceled or postponed nonabortion services (e.g., general gynecologic care); cancelation or postponement of abortion services was less common (25-38%, depending on type) and again especially prevalent in the South and Midwest. Respondents reported the pandemic had had numerous effects on their clinics, including disrupting their workforce, clinic flow and work practices; increasing expenses; and reducing revenues. State laws (including designations of abortion as nonessential) had exacerbated these difficulties. CONCLUSIONS: Although independent abortion clinics have faced considerable challenges from the pandemic, most continued to provide abortion care. Despite this resiliency, additional support may be needed to ensure sustainability of these clinics.
  • |*COVID-19[MESH]
  • |Abortion, Induced/*statistics & numerical data[MESH]
  • |Ambulatory Care Facilities/*statistics & numerical data[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Health Care Surveys[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Practice Patterns, Physicians'/*statistics & numerical data[MESH]
  • |Pregnancy[MESH]
  • |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box