Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.35.2.24692

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.35.2.24692
suck pdf from google scholar
33282060!7687553!33282060
unlimited free pdf from europmc33282060    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33282060&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid33282060      Pan+Afr+Med+J 2020 ; 35 (Suppl 2): 105
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Elevated levels of D-dimer in patients with COVID-19: prognosis value #MMPMID33282060
  • Oualim S; Abdeladim S; Ouarradi AE; Bensahi I; Hafid S; Naitlho A; Bouaiti E; Sabry M
  • Pan Afr Med J 2020[]; 35 (Suppl 2): 105 PMID33282060show ga
  • INTRODUCTION: coronavirus disease is now a global pandemic due to rapid human-to-human transmission. It can cause mild to fatal respiratory, cardiovascular, and neurological diseases. We aimed to find out whether elevated D-dimer levels are a predictor of the bad progression of COVID-19 to help reducing the mortality. METHODS: the data of COVID-19 patients from March 21, 2020 to April 24, 2020 were retrieved from the Cheick Khalifa Hospital database. We used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to get the optimum cutoff value of D-dimer levels on admission and after 5 days. We used these cutoffs to divide patients into two groups and compare the in-hospital mortality between them to assess the prognosis value of D-dimer levels. RESULTS: the data of COVID-19 patients from March 21, 2020 to April 24, 2020 were retrieved from the Cheick Khalifa Hospital database. We used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to get the optimum cutoff value of D-dimer levels on admission and after 5 days. We used these cutoffs to divide patients into two groups and compare the in-hospital mortality between them to assess the prognosis value of D-dimer levels. 89 patients were included in this study, of whom 79 were discharged and 10 died in hospital. The optimum cutoff value to predict mortality in patient using D-dimer levels on admission was 668 ng/ml (sensitivity 90%, specificity 63.3%, Areas under the ROC curve 0,775). As for D-dimer levels on day 5, it was 1360 ng/ml (sensitivity 100%, specificity 88,6%, Areas under the ROC curve 0.946). The group with D-dimer levels on day 5 > 1360 ng/ml (19 patients) had a worst evolution and a higher incidence of mortality compared to the group with D-dimer < 1360 ng/ml (69 patients) (10/19 vs 0/69, P = 0,0002). CONCLUSION: D-dimer greater than 1360 ng/ml on day 5 could help clinicians identify patients with poor prognosis at an early stage of COVID-19.
  • |*SARS-CoV-2[MESH]
  • |Adult[MESH]
  • |Aged[MESH]
  • |Biomarkers/blood[MESH]
  • |COVID-19/blood/*diagnosis/mortality[MESH]
  • |Databases, Factual[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/*metabolism[MESH]
  • |Hospital Mortality[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Middle Aged[MESH]
  • |Morocco[MESH]
  • |Prognosis[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box