Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.ajic.2020.11.022 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.ajic.2020.11.022 33279587!8024221!33279587     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Am+J+Infect+Control 2021 ; 49 (6): 825-835 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33279587|t=2021. Safety in the practice of decontaminating filtering facepiece respirators: A systematic review |pdf=|usr=}}{{33279587}} gab.com Text Safety in the practice of decontaminating filtering facepiece respirators: A systematic review JO: Am J Infect Control http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33279587 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: Considering the new SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and the potential scarcity of material resources, the reuse of personal protective equipment such as filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) for N95 filtering or higher is being discussed, mainly regarding the effectiveness and safety of cleaning, disinfection and sterilization processes. AIM: To analyze the available evidence in the literature on the safety in processing FFRs. METHODS: A systematic review conducted by searching for studies in the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, LILACS, CENTRAL, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus. RESULTS: Forty studies were included in this review. The disinfectant/sterilizing agents most frequently tested at different concentrations and exposure periods were ultraviolet irradiation, vaporized hydrogen peroxide and steam sterilization. Microbial reduction was assessed in 21 (52.5%) studies. The only disinfectants/sterilizers that did not caused degradation of the material-integrity were alcohol, electric cooker, ethylene oxide, and peracetic acid fogging. Exposure to ultraviolet irradiation or microwave generated-steam resulted in a nonsignificant reduction in filter performance. CONCLUSION: There is a complex relationship between the FFR raw materials and the cycle conditions of the decontamination methods, evidencing the need for validating FFRs by models and manufacturers, as well as the process. Some methods may require additional tests to demonstrate the safety of FFRs for use due to toxicity. Twit Text FOAVip Safety in the practice of decontaminating filtering facepiece respirators: A systematic review ????Am J Infect Control http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33279587 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33279587 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33279587}}</ref> Safety in the practice of decontaminating filtering facepiece respirators: A systematic review #MMPMID33279587 Gnatta JR; Souza RQ; Lemos CS; Oliveira RA; Martins LR; Moriya GAA; Poveda VB Am J Infect Control 2021[Jun]; 49 (6): 825-835 PMID33279587show ga BACKGROUND: Considering the new SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and the potential scarcity of material resources, the reuse of personal protective equipment such as filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) for N95 filtering or higher is being discussed, mainly regarding the effectiveness and safety of cleaning, disinfection and sterilization processes. AIM: To analyze the available evidence in the literature on the safety in processing FFRs. METHODS: A systematic review conducted by searching for studies in the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, LILACS, CENTRAL, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus. RESULTS: Forty studies were included in this review. The disinfectant/sterilizing agents most frequently tested at different concentrations and exposure periods were ultraviolet irradiation, vaporized hydrogen peroxide and steam sterilization. Microbial reduction was assessed in 21 (52.5%) studies. The only disinfectants/sterilizers that did not caused degradation of the material-integrity were alcohol, electric cooker, ethylene oxide, and peracetic acid fogging. Exposure to ultraviolet irradiation or microwave generated-steam resulted in a nonsignificant reduction in filter performance. CONCLUSION: There is a complex relationship between the FFR raw materials and the cycle conditions of the decontamination methods, evidencing the need for validating FFRs by models and manufacturers, as well as the process. Some methods may require additional tests to demonstrate the safety of FFRs for use due to toxicity. |*COVID-19[MESH] |*Respiratory Protective Devices[MESH] |Decontamination[MESH] |Equipment Reuse[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2[MESH]Safety in the practice of decontaminating filtering facepiece respirat(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing