Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.11.063

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.11.063
suck pdf from google scholar
33278416!7709476!33278416
unlimited free pdf from europmc33278416    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33278416&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid33278416      Int+J+Cardiol 2021 ; 328 (?): 247-249
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Challenges in activation of remote monitoring in patients with cardiac rhythm devices during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic #MMPMID33278416
  • Auricchio A; Conte G; Demarchi A; Baldi E; Ozkartal T; Regoli F; Moccetti T
  • Int J Cardiol 2021[Apr]; 328 (?): 247-249 PMID33278416show ga
  • BACKGROUND: Remote monitoring (RM) technology embedded in cardiac rhythm devices permits continuous monitoring of device function, and recording of selected cardiac physiological parameters and cardiac arrhythmias and may be of utmost utility during Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, when in-person office visit for regular follow-up were postponed. However, patients not alredy followed-up via RM represent a challenging group of patients to be managed during the lockdown. METHODS: We reviewed patient files scheduled for an outpatient visit between January 1, 2020 and May 11th, 2020 to assess the proportion of patients in whom RM activation was possible without office visit, and compared them to those scheduled for visit before the lockdown. RESULTS: During COVID-19 pandemic, RM activation was feasible in a minority of patients (7.8% of patients) expected at outpatient clinic for a follow-up visit and device check-up. This was possible in a good proportion of complex implantable devices such as cardiac resynchronization therapy and implantable cardioverter defibrillator but only in a minority of patients with a pacemaker the RM function could be activated during the period of restricted access to hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience strongly suggest to consider the systematic activation of RM function at the time of implantation or - by default programming - in all cardiac rhythm management devices.
  • |Aged[MESH]
  • |Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis/epidemiology/*therapy[MESH]
  • |COVID-19/epidemiology/*prevention & control[MESH]
  • |Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices/*standards/trends[MESH]
  • |Communicable Disease Control/standards/trends[MESH]
  • |Defibrillators, Implantable/*standards/trends[MESH]
  • |Female[MESH]
  • |Follow-Up Studies[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Male[MESH]
  • |Pandemics/prevention & control[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box