Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1007/s41649-020-00154-y http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s41649-020-00154-y 33262838!7687977!33262838     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33262838&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215       Asian+Bioeth+Rev 2021 ; 13 (2): 195-212 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33262838|t=2021. COVID-19: Against a Lockdown Approach |pdf=|usr=}}{{33262838}} gab.com Text COVID-19: Against a Lockdown Approach JO: Asian Bioeth Rev http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33262838 #FOAvip Governments around the world have faced the challenge of how to respond to the recent outbreak of a novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Some have reacted by greatly restricting the freedom of citizens, while others have opted for less drastic policies. In this paper, I draw a parallel with vaccination ethics to conceptualize two distinct approaches to COVID-19 that I call altruistic and lockdown. Given that the individual measures necessary to limit the spread of the virus can in principle be achieved voluntarily as well as through enforcement, the question arises of how much freedom governments ought to give citizens to adopt the required measures. I argue that an altruistic approach is preferable on moral grounds: it preserves important citizen freedoms, avoids a number of potential injustices, and gives people a much-needed sense of meaning in precarious times. Twit Text FOAVip COVID-19: Against a Lockdown Approach ????Asian Bioeth Rev http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33262838 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33262838 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33262838}}</ref> COVID-19: Against a Lockdown Approach #MMPMID33262838 Kraaijeveld SR Asian Bioeth Rev 2021[Jun]; 13 (2): 195-212 PMID33262838show ga Governments around the world have faced the challenge of how to respond to the recent outbreak of a novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Some have reacted by greatly restricting the freedom of citizens, while others have opted for less drastic policies. In this paper, I draw a parallel with vaccination ethics to conceptualize two distinct approaches to COVID-19 that I call altruistic and lockdown. Given that the individual measures necessary to limit the spread of the virus can in principle be achieved voluntarily as well as through enforcement, the question arises of how much freedom governments ought to give citizens to adopt the required measures. I argue that an altruistic approach is preferable on moral grounds: it preserves important citizen freedoms, avoids a number of potential injustices, and gives people a much-needed sense of meaning in precarious times. ?COVID-19: Against a Lockdown Approach (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing