Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.3171/2020.9.FOCUS20370 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3171/2020.9.FOCUS20370 33260123!?!33260123 Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=33260123&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215       Neurosurg+Focus 2020 ; 49 (6): E15 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33260123|t=2020. Reduced field of view under the surgical microscope due to personal protective equipment: lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic |pdf=|usr=}}{{33260123}} gab.com Text Reduced field of view under the surgical microscope due to personal protective equipment: lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic JO: Neurosurg Focus http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33260123 #FOAvip OBJECTIVE: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, neurosurgeons all around the globe continue to operate in emergency cases using new self-protective measures. Personal protective equipment (PPE) use is recommended in all surgeries. The authors have experienced varying degrees of field of view (FOV) loss under the surgical microscope with different PPE. Herein, they aimed to investigate the effects of different PPE on FOV while using the surgical microscope. METHODS: Fifteen neurosurgeons and neurosurgery residents participated in this study. Three kinds of PPE (safety spectacles, blast goggles, and face shields) were tested while using a surgical microscope. FOV was measured using a 12 x 12-cm checkered sheet of paper on which every square had an area of 25 mm2 under the microscope. The surgical microscope was positioned perpendicular to the test paper, and the zoom was fixed. Each participant marked on the test sheet the peripheral borders of their FOV while using different PPE and without wearing any PPE. A one-way repeated-measures ANOVA was performed to determine if there was a significant difference in FOV values with the different PPE. RESULTS: FOV was significantly different between each PPE (F[3, 42] = 6339.845, p < 0.0005). Post hoc analysis revealed a significant decrease in the FOV from the naked eye (9305.33 +/- 406.1 mm2) to blast goggles (2501.91 +/- 176.5 mm2) and face shields (92.33 +/- 6.4 mm2). There were no significant FOV changes with the safety spectacles (9267.45 +/- 410.5 mm2). CONCLUSIONS: While operating under a surgical microscope safety spectacles provide favorable FOVs. Face shields increase the eye piece-pupil distance, which causes a severe reduction in FOV. Twit Text FOAVip Reduced field of view under the surgical microscope due to personal protective equipment: lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic ????Neurosurg Focus http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33260123 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33260123 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33260123}}</ref> Reduced field of view under the surgical microscope due to personal protective equipment: lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic #MMPMID33260123 Celtikci E; Karaaslan B; Borcek AO; Emmez OH Neurosurg Focus 2020[Dec]; 49 (6): E15 PMID33260123show ga OBJECTIVE: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, neurosurgeons all around the globe continue to operate in emergency cases using new self-protective measures. Personal protective equipment (PPE) use is recommended in all surgeries. The authors have experienced varying degrees of field of view (FOV) loss under the surgical microscope with different PPE. Herein, they aimed to investigate the effects of different PPE on FOV while using the surgical microscope. METHODS: Fifteen neurosurgeons and neurosurgery residents participated in this study. Three kinds of PPE (safety spectacles, blast goggles, and face shields) were tested while using a surgical microscope. FOV was measured using a 12 x 12-cm checkered sheet of paper on which every square had an area of 25 mm2 under the microscope. The surgical microscope was positioned perpendicular to the test paper, and the zoom was fixed. Each participant marked on the test sheet the peripheral borders of their FOV while using different PPE and without wearing any PPE. A one-way repeated-measures ANOVA was performed to determine if there was a significant difference in FOV values with the different PPE. RESULTS: FOV was significantly different between each PPE (F[3, 42] = 6339.845, p < 0.0005). Post hoc analysis revealed a significant decrease in the FOV from the naked eye (9305.33 +/- 406.1 mm2) to blast goggles (2501.91 +/- 176.5 mm2) and face shields (92.33 +/- 6.4 mm2). There were no significant FOV changes with the safety spectacles (9267.45 +/- 410.5 mm2). CONCLUSIONS: While operating under a surgical microscope safety spectacles provide favorable FOVs. Face shields increase the eye piece-pupil distance, which causes a severe reduction in FOV. |*Visual Fields/physiology[MESH] |COVID-19/*prevention & control/transmission[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Microscopy/instrumentation/trends[MESH] |Microsurgery/instrumentation/*trends[MESH] |Neurosurgeons/*trends[MESH] |Neurosurgical Procedures/instrumentation/*trends[MESH]Reduced field of view under the surgical microscope due to personal pr(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing