Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.7861/clinmed.2020-0839 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.7861/clinmed.2020-0839 33243836!7850182!33243836     free     free     free       Clin+Med+(Lond) 2021 ; 21 (1): e54-e56 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33243836|t=2021. The impact of false positive COVID-19 results in an area of low prevalence |pdf=|usr=}}{{33243836}} gab.com Text The impact of false positive COVID-19 results in an area of low prevalence JO: Clin Med (Lond) http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33243836 #FOAvip False negative results in COVID-19 testing are well recognised and frequently discussed. False positive results, while less common and less frequently discussed, still have several adverse implications, including potential exposure of a non-infected person to the virus in a cohorted area. Although false positive results are proportionally greater in low prevalence settings, the consequences are significant at all times and potentially of greater significance in high-prevalence settings. We evaluated COVID-19 results in one area during a period of low prevalence. The consequences of these results are discussed and implications for these results in both high and low prevalence settings are considered. We also provide recommendations to minimise the risk and impact of false-positive results. Twit Text FOAVip The impact of false positive COVID-19 results in an area of low prevalence ????Clin Med (Lond) http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33243836 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33243836 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33243836}}</ref> The impact of false positive COVID-19 results in an area of low prevalence #MMPMID33243836 Healy B; Khan A; Metezai H; Blyth I; Asad H Clin Med (Lond) 2021[Jan]; 21 (1): e54-e56 PMID33243836show ga False negative results in COVID-19 testing are well recognised and frequently discussed. False positive results, while less common and less frequently discussed, still have several adverse implications, including potential exposure of a non-infected person to the virus in a cohorted area. Although false positive results are proportionally greater in low prevalence settings, the consequences are significant at all times and potentially of greater significance in high-prevalence settings. We evaluated COVID-19 results in one area during a period of low prevalence. The consequences of these results are discussed and implications for these results in both high and low prevalence settings are considered. We also provide recommendations to minimise the risk and impact of false-positive results. |COVID-19 Testing/*methods[MESH] |COVID-19/*diagnosis/epidemiology/virology[MESH] |False Negative Reactions[MESH] |False Positive Reactions[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Prevalence[MESH] |RNA, Viral/*analysis[MESH] |Retrospective Studies[MESH]The impact of false positive COVID-19 results in an area of low preval(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing