Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1038/s41562-020-01012-5 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1038/s41562-020-01012-5 33230283!ä!33230283 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 215.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 215.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Nat+Hum+Behav 2021 ; 5 (1): 28-38 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33230283|t=2021. Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America |pdf=|usr=}}{{33230283}} gab.com Text Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America JO: Nat Hum Behav http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33230283 #FOAvip Affective polarization has become a defining feature of twenty-first-century US politics, but we do not know how it relates to citizens' policy opinions. Answering this question has fundamental implications not only for understanding the political consequences of polarization, but also for understanding how citizens form preferences. Under most political circumstances, this is a difficult question to answer, but the novel coronavirus pandemic allows us to understand how partisan animus contributes to opinion formation. Using a two-wave panel that spans the outbreak of COVID-19, we find a strong association between citizens' levels of partisan animosity and their attitudes about the pandemic, as well as the actions they take in response to it. This relationship, however, is more muted in areas with severe outbreaks of the disease. Our results make clear that narrowing of issue divides requires not only policy discourse but also addressing affective partisan hostility. Twit Text FOAVip Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America ????Nat Hum Behav http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33230283 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33230283 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33230283}}</ref> Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America #MMPMID33230283 Druckman JN; Klar S; Krupnikov Y; Levendusky M; Ryan JB Nat Hum Behav 2021[Jan]; 5 (1): 28-38 PMID33230283show ga Affective polarization has become a defining feature of twenty-first-century US politics, but we do not know how it relates to citizens' policy opinions. Answering this question has fundamental implications not only for understanding the political consequences of polarization, but also for understanding how citizens form preferences. Under most political circumstances, this is a difficult question to answer, but the novel coronavirus pandemic allows us to understand how partisan animus contributes to opinion formation. Using a two-wave panel that spans the outbreak of COVID-19, we find a strong association between citizens' levels of partisan animosity and their attitudes about the pandemic, as well as the actions they take in response to it. This relationship, however, is more muted in areas with severe outbreaks of the disease. Our results make clear that narrowing of issue divides requires not only policy discourse but also addressing affective partisan hostility. |*Attitude to Health[MESH] |*Public Opinion[MESH] |COVID-19/*epidemiology/*psychology[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Politics[MESH] |Social Class[MESH] |Socioeconomic Factors[MESH]Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing