Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.3389/fpubh.2020.603894

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3389/fpubh.2020.603894
suck pdf from google scholar
33224924!7674549!33224924
unlimited free pdf from europmc33224924    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid33224924      Front+Public+Health 2020 ; 8 (?): 603894
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Responsible Factors of Panic Buying: An Observation From Online Media Reports #MMPMID33224924
  • Arafat SMY; Kar SK; Menon V; Alradie-Mohamed A; Mukherjee S; Kaliamoorthy C; Kabir R
  • Front Public Health 2020[]; 8 (?): 603894 PMID33224924show ga
  • Background: Panic buying is an erratic human behavior that has been reported irregularly and episodically. There is a dearth of studies exploring the identifiable factors accounting for it. We aimed to identify the factors responsible for panic buying extracted from online media reports. Methods: We scrutinized the media reports published in English discussing the different aspects of panic buying. We collected data until May 30, 2020, and searched the possible mentioned reasons responsible for panic buying. Results: We analyzed a total of 784 media reports. The majority of the reports were found in Bing (18%), Ecosia (12.6%), Google (26.4%), and Yahoo (12.5%). Panic buying was reported in 93 countries. Among the 784 responses, a total of 171 reports did not explain the responsible factors of panic buying. Therefore, we analyzed the remaining 613 reports to identify the same. A sense of scarcity was reportedly found as the important factor in about 75% of the reports followed by increased demand (66.07%), the importance of the product (45.02%), anticipation of price hike (23.33%), and due to COVID-19 and its related factors (13.21%). Other reported factors were a rumor, psychological factors (safety-seeking behavior, uncertainty, anxiety reduction, and taking control), social learning, lack of trust, government action, and past experience. Conclusions: The study revealed the responsible factors of panic buying extracted from media reports. Further, studies involving the individuals indulging in panic buying behavior are warranted to replicate the findings.
  • |*COVID-19[MESH]
  • |Anxiety[MESH]
  • |Consumer Behavior[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Panic[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box