Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1111/bioe.12834 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1111/bioe.12834 33222212!7753820!33222212     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Bioethics 2021 ; 35 (2): 135-142 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33222212|t=2021. Eating meat and not vaccinating: In defense of the analogy |pdf=|usr=}}{{33222212}} gab.com Text Eating meat and not vaccinating: In defense of the analogy JO: Bioethics http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33222212 #FOAvip The devastating impact of the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic is prompting renewed scrutiny of practices that heighten the risk of infectious disease. One such practice is refusing available vaccines known to be effective at preventing dangerous communicable diseases. For reasons of preventing individual harm, avoiding complicity in collective harm, and fairness, there is a growing consensus among ethicists that individuals have a duty to get vaccinated. I argue that these same grounds establish an analogous duty to avoid buying and eating most meat sold today, based solely on a concern for human welfare. Meat consumption is a leading driver of infectious disease. Wildlife sales at wet markets, bushmeat hunting, and concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) are all exceptionally risky activities that facilitate disease spread and impose immense harms on human populations. If there is a moral duty to vaccinate, we also should recognize a moral duty to avoid most meat. The paper concludes by considering the implications of this duty for policy. Twit Text FOAVip Eating meat and not vaccinating: In defense of the analogy ????Bioethics http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33222212 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33222212 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33222212}}</ref> Eating meat and not vaccinating: In defense of the analogy #MMPMID33222212 Jones B Bioethics 2021[Feb]; 35 (2): 135-142 PMID33222212show ga The devastating impact of the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic is prompting renewed scrutiny of practices that heighten the risk of infectious disease. One such practice is refusing available vaccines known to be effective at preventing dangerous communicable diseases. For reasons of preventing individual harm, avoiding complicity in collective harm, and fairness, there is a growing consensus among ethicists that individuals have a duty to get vaccinated. I argue that these same grounds establish an analogous duty to avoid buying and eating most meat sold today, based solely on a concern for human welfare. Meat consumption is a leading driver of infectious disease. Wildlife sales at wet markets, bushmeat hunting, and concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) are all exceptionally risky activities that facilitate disease spread and impose immense harms on human populations. If there is a moral duty to vaccinate, we also should recognize a moral duty to avoid most meat. The paper concludes by considering the implications of this duty for policy. |*COVID-19 Vaccines[MESH] |Animals[MESH] |COVID-19/prevention & control[MESH] |Diet, Vegetarian/*ethics[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Meat[MESH] |Moral Obligations[MESH] |SARS-CoV-2/physiology[MESH]Eating meat and not vaccinating: In defense of the analogy (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing