Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101920

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101920
suck pdf from google scholar
33220456!7674016!33220456
unlimited free pdf from europmc33220456    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi


Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 227.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534

Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 227.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
pmid33220456      Travel+Med+Infect+Dis 2020 ; 38 (ä): 101920
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Saliva as a possible tool for the SARS-CoV-2 detection: A review #MMPMID33220456
  • Medeiros da Silva RC; Nogueira Marinho LC; de Araujo Silva DN; Costa de Lima K; Pirih FQ; Luz de Aquino Martins AR
  • Travel Med Infect Dis 2020[Nov]; 38 (ä): 101920 PMID33220456show ga
  • BACKGROUND: Salivary tests for the new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) diagnosis have been suggested as alternative methods for the nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal tests. METHOD: Two reviewers independently performed a search in the following electronic databases: PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase and Scopus to identify cross-sectional and cohort studies that used saliva samples for SARS-CoV-2 detection. The search strategy was: ("saliva") and ("SARS-CoV-2" or "coronavirus" or "COVID-1"). RESULTS: A total of 363 studies were identified and 39 were selected for review. Salivary samples for SARS-CoV-2 detection was as consistent and sensitive as the nasopharyngeal swabs in most studies, having been effective in detecting asymptomatic infections previously tested negative in nasopharyngeal samples. Viral nucleic acids found in saliva obtained from the duct of the salivary gland may indicate infection in that gland. Live viruses could be detected in saliva by viral culture. CONCLUSIONS: Salivary samples show great potential in SARS-CoV-2 detection and may be recommended as a simple and non-invasive alternative.
  • |COVID-19 Testing[MESH]
  • |COVID-19/*diagnosis[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Nasopharynx/virology[MESH]
  • |SARS-CoV-2/*isolation & purification[MESH]
  • |Saliva/*virology[MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box