Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1007/s11019-020-09990-z http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s11019-020-09990-z 33216274!7678589!33216274     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 219.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 219.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 219.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Med+Health+Care+Philos 2021 ; 24 (1): 21-26 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=33216274|t=2021. Optimizing peer review to minimize the risk of retracting COVID-19-related literature |pdf=|usr=}}{{33216274}} gab.com Text Optimizing peer review to minimize the risk of retracting COVID-19-related literature JO: Med Health Care Philos http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33216274 #FOAvip Retractions of COVID-19 literature in both preprints and the peer-reviewed literature serve as a reminder that there are still challenging issues underlying the integrity of the biomedical literature. The risks to academia become larger when such retractions take place in high-ranking biomedical journals. In some cases, retractions result from unreliable or nonexistent data, an issue that could easily be avoided by having open data policies, but there have also been retractions due to oversight in peer review and editorial verification. As COVID-19 continues to affect academics and societies around the world, failures in peer review might also constitute a public health risk. The effectiveness by which COVID-19 literature is corrected, including through retractions, depends on the stringency of measures in place to detect errors and to correct erroneous literature. It also relies on the stringent implementation of open data policies. Twit Text FOAVip Optimizing peer review to minimize the risk of retracting COVID-19-related literature ????Med Health Care Philos http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33216274 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=33216274 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|33216274}}</ref> Optimizing peer review to minimize the risk of retracting COVID-19-related literature #MMPMID33216274 Teixeira da Silva JA; Bornemann-Cimenti H; Tsigaris P Med Health Care Philos 2021[Mar]; 24 (1): 21-26 PMID33216274show ga Retractions of COVID-19 literature in both preprints and the peer-reviewed literature serve as a reminder that there are still challenging issues underlying the integrity of the biomedical literature. The risks to academia become larger when such retractions take place in high-ranking biomedical journals. In some cases, retractions result from unreliable or nonexistent data, an issue that could easily be avoided by having open data policies, but there have also been retractions due to oversight in peer review and editorial verification. As COVID-19 continues to affect academics and societies around the world, failures in peer review might also constitute a public health risk. The effectiveness by which COVID-19 literature is corrected, including through retractions, depends on the stringency of measures in place to detect errors and to correct erroneous literature. It also relies on the stringent implementation of open data policies. |*Peer Review/methods[MESH] |*Retraction of Publication as Topic[MESH] |COVID-19/*therapy[MESH] |Editorial Policies[MESH] |Humans[MESH] |Periodicals as Topic/standards[MESH] |Risk Factors[MESH]Optimizing peer review to minimize the risk of retracting COVID-19-rel(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing